The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence for clonal population structure in Escherichia coli.
Open accessAbstract
Genotypes of 142 K1 isolates of four O serogroups of Escherichia coli from human hosts in Europe and the United States were characterized by an electrophoretic analysis of allozymic variation in 12 chromosomally encoded enzymes. The genetic structure of natural populations revealed by this analysis is closely similar to that indicated in earlier studies by Achtman and colleagues of the electrophoretic migration pattern for four outer membrane proteins and the chemical structure of the cell-wall lipopolysaccharides. The combined evidence demonstrates that most of the K1 isolates belong to a small number of geographically widespread clones. The distribution of O serogroups among the isolates does not consistently correspond to the clonal structure; O1:K1 isolates represent at least two distantly related, geographically widespread clones, one of which is genetically similar to a clone of the O18:K1 serotype. These findings for K1 isolates add to a growing body of evidence supporting the hypothesis that the genetic structure of natural populations of E. coli is basically clonal, with very limited recombination of chromosomal genes. Clonal structure has important implications for the study of the determinants of pathogenicity and disease specificity in E. coli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sharp, P. M., & Li, W.-H. (1987) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/15.3.1281 · Cited by 3,992
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology
Lakhundi, S., & Zhang, K. (2018) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00020-18 · Cited by 1,637
The population genetics of commensal Escherichia coli
Tenaillon, O., Skurnik, D., Picard, B., & Denamur, E. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2298 · Cited by 1,533
Phage Host Range and Efficiency of Plating
Kutter, E. (2009) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-164-6_14 · Cited by 558
Organization of the bacterial chromosome
KRAWIEC, S., & Riley, M. (1990) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.54.4.502-539.1990 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Ochman, H., & Selander, R. K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1984-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 198-201
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2027972741
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for clonal population structure in Escherichia coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.81.1.198
- The paper
- Ochman, H., & Selander, R. K. (1984). Evidence for clonal population structure in Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.1.198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.