Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A consistent picture of protein dynamics.

Open access
Parak, F, Knapp, E W·1984·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Information about the protein dynamics of myoglobin obtained by x-ray and Mössbauer investigations is analyzed and compared with computer simulations. Computer simulations give correct amplitudes of mean-square displacements but fail in the description of the time dependence of motions. Our model describes protein dynamics at physiological temperatures as an overdamped diffusion-like motion in a restricted space. The fluctuations occur around the average conformation determined by x-ray structure analysis. The gain in entropy drives the molecule into the transition state and, in this way, accounts for its flexibility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.81.22.7088

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Parak, F., & Knapp, E. W.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1984-11
Volume
81
Issue
22
Pages
7088-7092
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2055038996
Cited by
158
References
0
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A consistent picture of protein dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.81.22.7088
The paper
Parak, F., & Knapp, E. W. (1984). A consistent picture of protein dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.22.7088

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.