The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Survival of UV-irradiated mammalian cells correlates with efficient DNA repair in an essential gene.
Open accessAbstract
The survival of UV-irradiated mammalian cells is not necessarily correlated with their overall capacity to carry out DNA repair. Human cells typically remove 80% of the pyrimidine dimers produced by a UV dose of 5 J/m2 within 24 hr. In contrast, a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line survives UV irradiation equally well while removing only 15% of the dimers. Using a newly developed technique to measure dimer frequencies in single-copy specific sequences, we find that the CHO cells remove 70% of the dimers from the essential dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene but only 20% from sequences located 30 kilobases or more upstream from the 5' end of the gene in a 24-hr period. Repair-deficient human cells from xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XPC) are similar to the CHO cells in overall repair levels, but they are extremely sensitive to killing by UV irradiation. In the XPC cells, we find little or no repair in the DHFR gene; in contrast, in normal human fibroblasts and epidermal keratinocytes, greater than 80% of the dimers induced in the gene by 20 J/m2 are removed in 24 hr. Since the CHO and normal human cells exhibit similar UV resistance, much higher than that of XPC cells, our findings suggest a correlation between efficient repair of essential genes and resistance to DNA-damaging agents such as UV light.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bohr, V (1985) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(85)90150-3 · Cited by 1,237
Self-citation
Cited by
MELLON, I. (1987) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(87)90151-6 · Cited by 1,228
THE BIOLOGY OF THE (6–4) PHOTOPRODUCT
MITCHELL, D. L., & NAIRN, R. S. (1989) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb05578.x · Cited by 592
Preferential DNA repair of an active gene in human cells.
Mellon, I., Bohr, V. A., Smith, C. A., & Hanawalt, P. C. (1986) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.83.23.8878 · Cited by 447
Self-citationRatner, J. N., Balasubramanian, B., Corden, J., Warren, S. L., & Bregman, D. B. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.9.5184 · Cited by 233
Blakely, E. A., & Kronenberg, A. (1998) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3579815 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Bohr, V. A., Okumoto, D. S., & Hanawalt, P. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1986-06
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3830-3833
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1981380587
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival of UV-irradiated mammalian cells correlates with efficient DNA repair in an essential gene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.83.11.3830
- The paper
- Bohr, V. A., Okumoto, D. S., & Hanawalt, P. C. (1986). Survival of UV-irradiated mammalian cells correlates with efficient DNA repair in an essential gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.11.3830
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.