The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hypothesis about the function of membrane-buried proline residues in transport proteins.
Open accessAbstract
In a survey of the bilayer-spanning regions of integral membrane proteins, membrane-buried proline residues were found in nearly all transport proteins examined, whereas membrane-buried regions of nontransport proteins were largely devoid of intramembranous proline residues. When amino acids from the complete sequences of representative sets of transport and nontransport membrane proteins were analyzed for the distribution of proline residues between aqueous vs. membranous domains, proline was shown to be selectively excluded from membranous domains of the nontransport proteins, in accord with expectation from energetic and structural considerations. In contrast, proline residues in transport proteins were evenly distributed between aqueous and membranous domains, consistent with the notion that functional membrane-buried proline residues are selectively included in transport proteins. As cis peptide bonds involving proline arise in proteins and have been implicated in protein dynamic processes, the cis-trans isomerization of an Xaa-Pro peptide bond (Xaa = unspecified amino acid) buried within the membrane--and the resulting redirection of the protein chain--is proposed to provide the reversible conformational change requisite for the regulation (opening/closing) of a transport channel. Parallel to this function, the relatively negative character of the carbonyl groups of Xaa-Pro peptide bonds may promote their participation as intramembranous liganding sites for positive species in proton/cation transport processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nucifora, G., Chu, L., Misra, T. K., & Silver, S. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.10.3544 · Cited by 359
The Role of Proline and Glycine in Determining the Backbone Flexibility of a Channel-Forming Peptide
Jacob, J., Duclohier, H., & Cafiso, D. S. (1999) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(99)77298-x · Cited by 139
Search and Subvert: Minimalist Bacterial Phosphatidylinositol-Specific Phospholipase C Enzymes
Roberts, M. F., Khan, H. M., Goldstein, R., Reuter, N., & Gershenson, A. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00208 · Cited by 35
Vainauskas, S., & Menon, A. K. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m312191200 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Brandl, C. J., & Deber, C. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1986-02
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 917-921
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1988867706
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hypothesis about the function of membrane-buried proline residues in transport proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.83.4.917
- The paper
- Brandl, C. J., & Deber, C. M. (1986). Hypothesis about the function of membrane-buried proline residues in transport proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.4.917
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.