The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides.
Open accessAbstract
A method is described for the inclusion of the effects of hydration in empirical conformational energy computations on polypeptides. The free energy of hydration is composed of additive contributions of various functional groups. The hydration of each group is assumed to be proportional to the accessible surface area of the group. The constants of proportionality, representing the free energy of hydration per unit area of accessible surface, have been evaluated for seven classes of groups (occurring in peptides) by least-squares fitting to experimental free energies of solution of small monofunctional aliphatic and aromatic molecules. The same method has also been applied to the modeling of the enthalpy and heat capacity of hydration, each of which is computed from the accessible surface area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kanaya, S., Oobatake, M., & Liu, Y. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.51.32729 · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ooi, T., Oobatake, M., Némethy, G., & Scheraga, H. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1987-05
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3086-3090
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2037603210
- Cited by
- 746
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
