The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Micrometastatic cancer cells in bone marrow: in vitro detection with anti-cytokeratin and in vivo labeling with anti-17-1A monoclonal antibodies.
Open accessAbstract
The detection of early micrometastasis or disseminated single tumor cells poses a problem for conventional diagnosis procedures. Using a panel of monoclonal antibodies against cytokeratin and the 17-1A epithelial antigen we identified immunocytochemically tumor cells in bone marrow of patients with breast cancer (n = 155) and colorectal cancer (n = 57) at the time of surgery of the primary tumor. Monoclonal antibody CK2, recognizing the human cytokeratin component 18 in simple epithelia, appeared to be the most suitable reagent because of its negative reaction with bone marrow samples of the noncarcinoma patients (n = 75). Its specificity was further demonstrated in a double-marker staining procedure using an anti-leukocyte common antigen monoclonal antibody (T200) as counterstain. A comparative analysis showed that immunocytology was clearly superior to conventional cytology (n = 212) and histology (n = 39). In 9.5-20.5% of patients without distant metastasis, tumor cells could be detected in bone marrow. We found a significant correlation between tumor cells in bone marrow and conventional risk factors, such as distant metastasis or lymph node involvement. In a first approach toward immunotherapy we demonstrated in 3 patients that infused monoclonal antibody 17-1A can label single tumor cells in bone marrow in vivo. We then used this approach to follow up 7 patients undergoing 17-1A therapy in an adjuvant clinical trial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The lingering mysteries of metastatic recurrence in breast cancer
Riggio, A. I., Varley, K. E., & Welm, A. L. (2021) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-020-01161-4 · Cited by 616
Eyles, J., Puaux, A.-L., Wang, X., Toh, B., Prakash, C., Hong, M., Tan, T. G., Zheng, L., Ong, L. C., Jin, Y., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci42002 · Cited by 506
Cote, R. J., Rosen, P. P., Lesser, M. L., Old, L. J., & Osborne, M. P. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1991.9.10.1749 · Cited by 435
Hepatic stellate cells suppress NK cell-sustained breast cancer dormancy
Correia, A. L., Guimaraes, J. C., Auf der Maur, P., De Silva, D., Trefny, M. P., Okamoto, R., Bruno, S., Schmidt, A., Mertz, K., Volkmann, K., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03614-z · Cited by 339
Metastasis prevention by targeting the dormant niche
Ghajar, C. M. (2015) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3910 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlimok, G., Funke, I., Holzmann, B., Göttlinger, G., Schmidt, G., Häuser, H., Swierkot, S., Warnecke, H. H., Schneider, B., Koprowski, H., & Riethmüller, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1987-12
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 8672-8676
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2056507674
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Micrometastatic cancer cells in bone marrow: in vitro detection with anti-cytokeratin and in vivo labeling with anti-17-1A monoclonal antibodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.84.23.8672
- The paper
- Schlimok, G., Funke, I., Holzmann, B., Göttlinger, G., Schmidt, G., Häuser, H., Swierkot, S., Warnecke, H. H., Schneider, B., Koprowski, H., & Riethmüller, G. (1987). Micrometastatic cancer cells in bone marrow: in vitro detection with anti-cytokeratin and in vivo labeling with anti-17-1A monoclonal antibodies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.84.23.8672
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.