The DOI matches its Crossref record.
GTP-binding domain: three consensus sequence elements with distinct spacing.
Open accessAbstract
A sequence comparison of nine functionally different GTP-binding protein families has yielded further information on the general characterization of the conservation and importance of amino acid sequences in the GTP-binding domain, including a consensus sequence composed of three consensus elements GXXXXGK, DXXG, and NKXD with consensus spacings of either 40-80 or approximately equal to 130-170 amino acid residues between the first and second elements and approximately 40-80 amino acid residues between the second and third sequence elements; the sequence NKXW in place of NKXD in the sequence element responsible for base specificity allows the use of ITP as well as GTP; dGTP can be used with essentially the same efficiency as GTP; signal transducing proteins and enzymes have been identified in the nine families; and family conservations allow the identification of the most probable consensus sequence element when more than one is present. Employing these features we have screened the protein sequence data base of the Protein Identification Resource and have identified only known GTP-binding proteins with the exception of protein 2C from foot-and-mouth disease virus as matching the consensus sequence. Based on this finding we predict that foot-and-mouth disease virus protein 2C binds GTP and, by analogy, that protein 2C from several related viruses (polio, rhino, encephalomyocarditis, and cowpea mosaic) will bind a nucleotide as part of its biologic activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular cloning and expression of an IL-6 signal transducer, gp130
Hibi, M., Murakami, M., Saito, M., Hirano, T., Taga, T., & Kishimoto, T. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90411-7 · Cited by 1,039
Human RAS Superfamily Proteins and Related GTPases
Colicelli, J. (2004) · Science's STKE · doi:10.1126/stke.2502004re13 · Cited by 582
Johnson, D. I., & Pringle, J. R. (1990) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.111.1.143 · Cited by 555
Murakami, M., Narazaki, M., Hibi, M., Yawata, H., Yasukawa, K., Hamaguchi, M., Taga, T., & Kishimoto, T. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.24.11349 · Cited by 408
Cloning of a 67-kD Neutrophil Oxidase Factor with Similarity to a Noncatalytic Region of p60 c-src
Leto, T. L., Lomax, K. J., Volpp, B. D., Nunoi, H., Sechler, J. M. G., Nauseef, W. M., Clark, R. A., Gallin, J. I., & Malech, H. L. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1692159 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Dever, T. E., Glynias, M. J., & Merrick, W. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1987-04
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1814-1818
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2100256775
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GTP-binding domain: three consensus sequence elements with distinct spacing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.84.7.1814
- The paper
- Dever, T. E., Glynias, M. J., & Merrick, W. C. (1987). GTP-binding domain: three consensus sequence elements with distinct spacing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.84.7.1814
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.