The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inheritance of color vision in a New World monkey (Saimiri sciureus)
Abstract
Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) have a striking color-vision polymorphism; each animal has one of six different types of color vision. These arise from individual variation in the presence of three different middle- to long-wavelength cone pigments. The distribution of cone phenotypes was established for a large sample of squirrel monkeys, including several families, through analysis of a retinal gross potential. The results indicate that the inheritance of color vision in the squirrel monkey can be explained by assuming that the three middle- to long-wavelength cone pigments are specified by three alleles at a single locus on the X chromosome. This arrangement is discretely different from that found in Old World monkeys and humans.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Consider the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus); two thirds of females are trichromats; however, all males and one third of the females are dichromats (Jacobs & Neitz, 1987).”
From The genetics of normal and defective color vision (2011) · cites this paper as Jacobs & Neitz, 1987
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The genetics of normal and defective color vision
Neitz, J., & Neitz, M. (2011) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.12.002 · Cited by 377
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobs, G. H., & Neitz, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1987-04
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2545-2549
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
