The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization and visualization of rat and guinea pig brain kappa opioid receptors: evidence for kappa 1 and kappa 2 opioid receptors.
Open accessAbstract
kappa opioid receptors (kappa receptors) have been characterized in homogenates of guinea pig and rat brain under in vitro binding conditions. kappa receptors were labeled by using the tritiated prototypic kappa opioid ethylketocyclazocine under conditions in which mu and delta opioid binding was suppressed. In the case of guinea pig brain membranes, a single population of high-affinity kappa opioid receptor sites (kappa sites; Kd = 0.66 nM, Bmax = 80 fmol/mg of protein) was observed. In contrast, in the case of rat brain, two populations of kappa sites were observed--high-affinity sites at low density (Kd = 1.0 nM, Bmax = 16 fmol/mg of protein) and low-affinity sites at high density (Kd = 13 nM, Bmax = 111 fmol/mg of protein). To test the hypothesis that the high- and low-affinity kappa sites represent two distinct kappa receptor subtypes, a series of opioids were tested for their abilities to compete for binding to the two sites. U-69,593 and Cambridge 20 selectively displaced the high-affinity kappa site in both guinea pig and rat tissue, but were inactive at the rat-brain low-affinity site. Other kappa opioid drugs, including U-50,488, ethylketocyclazocine, bremazocine, cyclazocine, and dynormphin (1-17), competed for binding to both sites, but with different rank orders of potency. Quantitative light microscopy in vitro autoradiography was used to visualize the neuroanatomical pattern of kappa receptors in rat and guinea pig brain. The distribution patterns of the two kappa receptor subtypes of rat brain were clearly different. The pattern of rat high-affinity kappa sites paralleled that of guinea pig in the caudate-putamen, mid-brain, central gray substance of cerebrum, and substantia nigra; interspecies differences were apparent throughout most of the rest of the brain. Collectively, these data provide direct evidence for the presence of two kappa receptor subtypes; the U-69,593-sensitive, high-affinity kappa 1 site predominates in guinea pig brain, and the U-69,593-insensitive, low-affinity kappa 2 site predominates in rat brain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates
(1982) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-63235-9 · Cited by 51,963
LIGAND: A versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems
Munson, P. J., & Rodbard, D. (1980) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(80)90515-1 · Cited by 8,429
Martin, W. R., Eades, C. G., Thompson, J. A., Huppler, R. E., & Gilbert, P. E. (1976) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)30536-7 · Cited by 2,992
Identification of a Family of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Genes
Bonner, T. I., Buckley, N. J., Young, A. C., & Brann, M. R. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3037705 · Cited by 1,427
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE k‐SUBTYPE OF THE OPIATE RECEPTOR IN THE GUINEA‐PIG BRAIN
KOSTERLITZ, H. W., PATERSON, S. J., & ROBSON, L. E. (1981) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1981.tb08749.x · Cited by 422
Tempel, A., & Zukin, R. S. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.12.4308 · Cited by 383
Self-citationSite-directed alkylation of multiple opioid receptors. I. Binding selectivity.
James, I. F., & Goldstein, A. (1984) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0026-895x(25)14957-2 · Cited by 199
Mu and kappa opioids inhibit transmitter release by different mechanisms.
Cherubini, E., & North, R. A. (1985) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.82.6.1860 · Cited by 161
Werz, M. A., & Macdonald, R. L. (1985) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)23292-x · Cited by 126
Goodman, R. R., & Snyder, S. H. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.18.5703 · Cited by 107
Cited by
Mu Opioids and Their Receptors: Evolution of a Concept
Pasternak, G. W., & Pan, Y.-X. (2013) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.112.007138 · Cited by 578
Effects of κ-opioid receptor ligands on intracranial self-stimulation in rats
Todtenkopf, M. S., Marcus, J. F., Portoghese, P. S., & Carlezon, W. A. (2004) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-003-1680-y · Cited by 273
Wagner, J. J., Terman, G. W., & Chavkin, C. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363451a0 · Cited by 271
kappa-Opioid receptor signaling and brain reward function
Bruijnzeel, A. W. (2009) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.09.008 · Cited by 214
Valdez, G. R., Platt, D. M., Rowlett, J. K., Rüedi-Bettschen, D., & Spealman, R. D. (2007) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.107.125484 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Zukin, R. S., Eghbali, M., Olive, D., Unterwald, E. M., & Tempel, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1988-06
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4061-4065
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2125152850
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization and visualization of rat and guinea pig brain kappa opioid receptors: evidence for kappa 1 and kappa 2 opioid receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.85.11.4061
- The paper
- Zukin, R. S., Eghbali, M., Olive, D., Unterwald, E. M., & Tempel, A. (1988). Characterization and visualization of rat and guinea pig brain kappa opioid receptors: evidence for kappa 1 and kappa 2 opioid receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.11.4061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.