The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetic analysis of indefinite division in human cells: identification of four complementation groups.
Open accessAbstract
Hybrids obtained following fusion of normal human diploid fibroblasts with different immortal human cell lines exhibited limited division potential. This led to the conclusion that the phenotype of cellular senescence is dominant and that immortal cells arise as a result of recessive changes in the growth control mechanisms of the normal cell. We have exploited the fact that immortality is recessive and, by fusing immortal human cell lines with each other, assigned 21 cell lines to at least four complementation groups for indefinite division. A wide variety of cell lines was included in the study to determine what parameters, if any, would affect complementation group assignment. The results indicate that cell type, embryonal layer of origin, and type of tumor do not affect group assignment. There does not appear to be any correlation between expression of an activated oncogene and group assignment. However, all of the immortal simian virus 40-transformed cell lines studied (with the exception of one xerodermapigmentosum fibroblast-derived line) assign to the same group, indicating that this virus immortalizes various human cells by the same processes. The assignment of immortal human cells to distinct groups provides the basis for a focused approach to determine the genes important in normal growth regulation that have been modified in immortal cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Telomere length predicts replicative capacity of human fibroblasts.
Allsopp, R. C., Vaziri, H., Patterson, C., Goldstein, S., Younglai, E. V., Futcher, A. B., Greider, C. W., & Harley, C. B. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.21.10114 · Cited by 2,200
Telomere loss: mitotic clock or genetic time bomb?
Harley, C. B. (1991) · Mutation Research/DNAging · doi:10.1016/0921-8734(91)90018-7 · Cited by 1,139
Telomere end-replication problem and cell aging
Levy, M. Z., Allsopp, R. C., Futcher, A. B., Greider, C. W., & Harley, C. B. (1992) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(92)90096-3 · Cited by 1,069
Toussaint, O., Medrano, E. E., & von Zglinicki, T. (2000) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/s0531-5565(00)00180-7 · Cited by 713
Replicative Senescence: Implications for in Vivo Aging and Tumor Suppression
Smith, J. R., & Pereira-Smith, O. M. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5271.63 · Cited by 547
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pereira-Smith, O. M., & Smith, J. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 6042-6046
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2052787638
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic analysis of indefinite division in human cells: identification of four complementation groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.85.16.6042
- The paper
- Pereira-Smith, O. M., & Smith, J. R. (1988). Genetic analysis of indefinite division in human cells: identification of four complementation groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.16.6042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.