Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Antimicrobial activity of synthetic magainin peptides and several analogues.

Open access
Zasloff, M, Martin, B, Chen, H C·1988·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We have previously reported the isolation of two broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides ("magainins") from the skin of the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis. These natural peptides are active against many species of bacteria and fungi and also induce osmotic lysis of protozoa. In this report we demonstrate that synthetic magainin peptides appear to be indistinguishable from the natural products with respect to chromatographic properties and biological activity. These studies demonstrate conclusively that the magainin peptides are potent antimicrobial substances.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.85.3.910

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Zasloff, M., Martin, B., & Chen, H. C.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1988-02
Volume
85
Issue
3
Pages
910-913
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2013092938
Cited by
373
References
0
FWCI
11.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial activity of synthetic magainin peptides and several analogues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.85.3.910
The paper
Zasloff, M., Martin, B., & Chen, H. C. (1988). Antimicrobial activity of synthetic magainin peptides and several analogues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.3.910

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.