The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Animal model for ultraviolet radiation-induced melanoma: platyfish-swordtail hybrid.
Open accessAbstract
Sunlight exposure is strongly indicated as one of the important etiologic agents in human cutaneous malignant melanoma. However, because of the absence of good animal models, it has not been possible to estimate the wavelengths or wavelength regions involved. We have developed a useful animal model from crosses and backcrosses of platyfish (Xiphophorus maculatus) and swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri). Two strains of these fish are susceptible to invasive melanoma induction by exposure to filtered radiation from sunlamps in the wavelength ranges lambda greater than 290 nm and lambda greater than 304 nm. Multiple exposures on 5-20 consecutive days beginning on day 5 after birth or a single exposure of approximately 200 J/(m2.day) of lambda greater than 304 nm result in a tumor prevalence of 20% to 40% at 4 months of age compared with a background rate of 12% in one strain and 2% in another. Exposure of the fish to visible light after UV exposure reduces the prevalence to background. The melanomas are similar in many respects to mammalian melanomas, as judged by light and electron microscopy. The genetics of the crosses determined by others and the high sensitivity of the hybrids to melanoma induction indicate that the UV radiation probably inactivates the one tumor repressor gene (or a small number of tumor repressor genes) in the hybrid fish. The small size of the animals and their high susceptibility to melanoma induction make them ideal for action spectroscopy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA repair protects against cutaneous and internal neoplasia: evidence from xeroderma pigmentosum
Kraemer, K. H., Lee, M. M., & Scotto, J. (1984) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/5.4.511 · Cited by 374
Cited by
A role for sunlight in skin-cancer – UV-induced p53 mutations in squamous-cell carcinoma
Brash, D. E., Rudolph, J. A., Simon, J. A., Lin, A., McKenna, G. J., Baden, H. P., Halperin, A. J., & Pontén, J. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.22.10124 · Cited by 1,959
The pathogenesis of melanoma induced by ultraviolet radiation
Gilchrest, B. A., Eller, M. S., Geller, A. C., & Yaar, M. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199904293401707 · Cited by 876
Wavelengths effective in induction of malignant melanoma.
Setlow, R. B., Grist, E., Thompson, K., & Woodhead, A. D. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.14.6666 · Cited by 719
Self-citationSolar and ultraviolet radiation
Gies, P., Roy, C., & Udelhofen, P. (2004) · Cancer Prevention — Cancer Causes · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0511-0_3 · Cited by 354
Ultraviolet radiation and cutaneous malignant melanoma
Jhappan, C., Noonan, F. P., & Merlino, G. (2003) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206450 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Setlow, R. B., Woodhead, A. D., & Grist, E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 8922-8926
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2054286843
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Animal model for ultraviolet radiation-induced melanoma: platyfish-swordtail hybrid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.86.22.8922
- The paper
- Setlow, R. B., Woodhead, A. D., & Grist, E. (1989). Animal model for ultraviolet radiation-induced melanoma: platyfish-swordtail hybrid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.22.8922
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.