The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular patterns of X chromosome-linked color vision genes among 134 men of European ancestry.
Abstract
We used Southern blot hybridization to study X chromosome-linked color vision genes encoding the apoproteins of red and green visual pigments in 134 unselected Caucasian men. One hundred and thirteen individuals (84.3%) had a normal arrangement of their color vision pigment genes. All had one red pigment gene; the number of green pigment genes ranged from one to five with a mode of two. The frequency of molecular genotypes indicative of normal color vision (84.3%) was significantly lower than had been observed in previous studies of color vision phenotypes. Color vision defects can be due to deletions of red or green pigment genes or due to formation of hybrid genes comprising portions of both red and green pigment genes [Nathans, J., Piantanida, T.P., Eddy, R.L., Shows, T.B., Jr., & Hogness, D.S. (1986) Science 232, 203-210]. Characteristic anomalous patterns were seen in 15 (11.2%) individuals: 7 (5.2%) had patterns characteristic of deuteranomaly (mild defect in green color perception), 2 (1.5%) had patterns characteristic of deuteranopia (severe defect in green color perception), and 6 (4.5%) had protan patterns (the red perception defects protanomaly and protanopia cannot be differentiated by current molecular methods). Previously undescribed hybrid gene patterns consisting of both green and red pigment gene fragments in addition to normal red and green genes were observed in another 6 individuals (4.5%). Only 2 of these patterns were considered as deuteranomalous. Thus, DNA testing detected anomalous color vision pigment genes at a higher frequency than expected from phenotypic color vision tests. Some color vision gene arrays associated with hybrid genes are likely to mediate normal color vision.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among individuals with normal color vision there is variability in the number of OPN1LW and OPN1MW genes per X-chromosome array, with more variability in the number of OPN1MW than in OPN1LW genes.
“Among individuals with normal color vision there is variability in the number of OPN1LW and OPN1MW genes per X-chromosome array, with more variability in the number of OPN1MW than in OPN1LW genes”
From The genetics of normal and defective color vision (2011) · cites this paper as Drummond-Borg, Deeb & Motulsky, 1989
This deutan array structure is the one most commonly found in deuteranomalous males.
“This array structure is the one most commonly found in deuteranomlous males”
From The genetics of normal and defective color vision (2011) · cites this paper as Drummond-Borg et al., 1989
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The genetics of normal and defective color vision
Neitz, J., & Neitz, M. (2011) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.12.002 · Cited by 377
McBee, J. K., Palczewski, K., Baehr, W., & Pepperberg, D. R. (2001) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/s1350-9462(01)00002-7 · Cited by 366
Evolution and spectral tuning of visual pigments in birds and mammals
Hunt, D. M., Carvalho, L. S., Cowing, J. A., & Davies, W. L. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0044 · Cited by 234
MOLECULAR GENETICS OF HUMAN VISUAL PIGMENTS
Nathans, J., Merbs, S. L., Sung, C.-H., Weitz, C. J., & Wang, Y. (1992) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.26.120192.002155 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Drummond-Borg, M., Deeb, S. S., & Motulsky, A. G.
- Affiliations
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 983-987
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review