Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 450

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantitative assay for totipotent reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells by a competitive repopulation strategy.

Open access
Szilvassy, S J, Humphries, R K, Lansdorp, P M, Eaves, A C, Eaves, C J·1990·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Although hematopoiesis is known to originate in a population of very primitive cells with both lymphopoietic and myelopoietic potential, a procedure for enumerating such cells has to date not been available. We now describe a quantitative assay for long-term repopulating stem cells with the potential for reconstituting all hematopoietic lineages. This assay has two key features. The first is the use of competitive repopulation conditions that ensure not only the detection of a very primitive class of hematopoietic stem cells but also the survival of lethally irradiated mice transplanted with very low numbers of such cells. The second is the use of a limiting-dilution experimental design to allow stem cell quantitation. The assay involves transplanting limiting numbers of male "test" cells into lethally irradiated syngeneic female recipients together with 1-2 x 10(5) syngeneic female marrow cells whose long-term repopulating ability has been compromised by two previous cycles of marrow transplantation. The proportion of assay recipients whose regenerated hematopoietic tissues are determined to contain greater than or equal to 5% cells of test cell origin (male) greater than or equal to 5 weeks later is then used to calculate the frequency of competitive repopulating units (CRU) in the original male test cell suspension (based on Poisson statistics). Investigation of this assay system has shown that all three potential sources of stem cells (test cells, compromised cells, and the host) can under appropriate circumstances contribute to long-term hematopoietic regeneration, thus establishing both the competitive pressure of hematopoietic stem cells in the cotransplanted compromised population and in the host, and the need to use genetic markers to track the specific contribution of the injected test cells. Analysis of the frequency of CRU in test marrow suspensions that varied widely in their CRU content gave similar values when endpoints of either 5 or 10 weeks posttransplantation were used and when either recipient marrow or thymus was used to identify progeny populations. In addition, repopulation of marrow and thymus was found to be associated in most mice injected with limiting numbers of test cells. These findings are consistent with the conclusion that the assay is highly selective for a very primitive, totipotent, reconstituting hematopoietic stem cell and should therefore be particularly useful in future gene therapy-oriented research as well as for more basic studies of hematopoietic stem cell regulation and differentiation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.87.22.8736

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 450

Metadata

Authors
Szilvassy, S. J., Humphries, R. K., Lansdorp, P. M., Eaves, A. C., & Eaves, C. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1990-11
Volume
87
Issue
22
Pages
8736-8740
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2083459784
Cited by
450
References
0
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative assay for totipotent reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells by a competitive repopulation strategy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.87.22.8736
The paper
Szilvassy, S. J., Humphries, R. K., Lansdorp, P. M., Eaves, A. C., & Eaves, C. J. (1990). Quantitative assay for totipotent reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells by a competitive repopulation strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.22.8736

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.