The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clusters of intragenic Alu repeats predispose the human C1 inhibitor locus to deleterious rearrangements.
Open accessAbstract
Frequent alterations in the structure of the complement component C1 inhibitor gene have been found in patients affected by the common variant of hereditary angioedema, characterized by low plasma levels of C1 inhibitor. This control protein limits the enzymic activity of the first component of complement and of other plasma serine proteases. Sequence comparisons of a 4.6-kilobase-long segment of the normal gene and the corresponding gene segments isolated from two patients carrying family-specific DNA deletions point to unusually long clusters of tandem repeats of the Alu sequence family as a source of genetic instability in this locus. Unequal crossovers, in a variety of registers, among Alu sequences of the clusters result in deletions of variable length that encompass exon 4. In a third family, exon 4 was instead found to be duplicated along with the same tracts of flanking introns lost in one of the deletions. In addition to undergoing Alu-mediated partial deletions and duplications, the gene is also a target for more recent retroposition events. Gross alterations in the C1 inhibitor gene account for about 20% of the hereditary angioedema chromosomes and consequently make this gene a prime example of the mutagenic liability of Alu repeats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deininger, P. L., & Batzer, M. A. (1999) · Molecular Genetics and Metabolism · doi:10.1006/mgme.1999.2864 · Cited by 909
Roles for retrotransposon insertions in human disease
Hancks, D. C., & Kazazian, H. H. (2016) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/s13100-016-0065-9 · Cited by 670
Which transposable elements are active in the human genome?
Mills, R. E., Bennett, E. A., Iskow, R. C., & Devine, S. E. (2007) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.006 · Cited by 511
Reconstruction and analysis of human alu genes
Jurka, J., & Milosavljevic, A. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02515383 · Cited by 289
Sex chromosomes, recombination, and chromatin conformation
McKee, B. D., & Handel, M. A. (1993) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/bf00356023 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Carter, P. E., Meo, T., & Tosi, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1551-1555
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2007846678
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clusters of intragenic Alu repeats predispose the human C1 inhibitor locus to deleterious rearrangements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.87.4.1551
- The paper
- Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Carter, P. E., Meo, T., & Tosi, M. (1990). Clusters of intragenic Alu repeats predispose the human C1 inhibitor locus to deleterious rearrangements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.4.1551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.