The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stimulation of high-affinity adenosine A2 receptors decreases the affinity of dopamine D2 receptors in rat striatal membranes.
Open accessAbstract
Since high-affinity adenosine A2 receptors (A2a) are localized exclusively in dopamine-rich regions in the central nervous system and mediate inhibition of locomotor activity, we have examined the effect of A2a receptor activation on D1 and D2 receptor binding in membrane preparations of the rat striatum. The A2a agonist 2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino]-5'- N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680) increased the Kd of the dopamine D2 agonist L-(-)-N-[3H]propylnorapomorphine without affecting the Bmax. The increase in Kd was maximal (40%) at 30 nM CGS 21680. CGS 21680 (30 nM) decreased the dopamine-induced inhibition of [3H]raclopride (a D2 antagonist) binding due to an increase (about 3-fold) in KH and KL, the dissociation constants of high- and low-affinity binding sites. The effects of CGS 21680 were antagonized by the adenosine antagonist 8-phenyltheophylline (10 microM). (-)-N6-(2-Phenylisopropyl)adenosine produced an effect similar to that of CGS 21680, provided the concentration used was high enough to stimulate A2a receptors (300 nM). GTP (50 microM) also decreased the dopamine-induced inhibition of [3H]raclopride binding but, in contrast to CGS 21680, GTP decreased the proportion of D2 receptors in the high-affinity state. CGS 21680 (30 nM) did not affect the Kd or Bmax of [3H]raclopride and failed to affect ligand binding to D1 receptors. Thus, stimulation of A2a receptors potently reduces the affinity of D2 agonist binding sites within the plasma membrane of striatal neurons. This A2a-D2 interaction may underlie the neuroleptic-like actions of adenosine agonists and the enhancing effects of adenosine antagonists, such as caffeine, on locomotor activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fredholm, B. B., Bättig, K., Holmén, J., Nehlig, A., & Zvartau, E. E. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01396-6 · Cited by 2,624
Self-citationInternational Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors
Fredholm, B. B., IJzerman, A. P., Jacobson, K. A., Klotz, K.-N., & Linden, J. (2001) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01511-4 · Cited by 2,585
Self-citationAdenosine Receptors as Therapeutic Targets
Jacobson, K. A., & Gao, Z.-G. (2006) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1983 · Cited by 1,431
Pharmacology of Adenosine Receptors: The State of the Art
Borea, P. A., Gessi, S., Merighi, S., Vincenzi, F., & Varani, K. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00049.2017 · Cited by 783
Adenosine, Adenosine Receptors and the Actions of Caffeine
Fredholm, B. B. (1995) · Pharmacology & Toxicology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0773.1995.tb00111.x · Cited by 597
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferre, S., von Euler, G., Johansson, B., Fredholm, B. B., & Fuxe, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1991-08-15
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 7238-7241
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2062214351
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimulation of high-affinity adenosine A2 receptors decreases the affinity of dopamine D2 receptors in rat striatal membranes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.88.16.7238
- The paper
- Ferre, S., von Euler, G., Johansson, B., Fredholm, B. B., & Fuxe, K. (1991). Stimulation of high-affinity adenosine A2 receptors decreases the affinity of dopamine D2 receptors in rat striatal membranes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.16.7238
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.