The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic changes in receptive-field size in cat primary visual cortex.
Open accessAbstract
Immediately after focal retinal lesions, receptive fields (RFs) in primary visual cortex expand considerably, even when the retinal damage is limited to the photoreceptor layer. The time course of these changes suggests that mere lack of stimulation in the vicinity of the RF accompanied by stimulation in the surrounding region causes the RF expansion. While recording from single cells in cat area 17, we simulated this pattern of stimulation with a pattern of moving lines in the visual field, masking out an area covering the RF of the recorded cell, thereby producing an "artificial scotoma." Over approximately 10 min this masking resulted in a 5-fold average expansion in RF area. Stimulating the RF center caused the field to collapse in size, returning to near its original extent; reconditioning with the masked stimulus led to RF reexpansion. Stimulation in the surrounding region was required for the RF expansion to occur--little expansion was seen during exposure to a blank screen. We propose that the expansion may account for visual illusions, such as perceptual fill-in of stabilized images and illusory contours and may constitute the prodrome of altered cortical topography after retinal lesions. These findings support the idea that even in adult animals RFs are dynamic, capable of being altered by the sensory context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceptual filling in of artificially induced scotomas in human vision
Ramachandran, V. S., & Gregory, R. L. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/350699a0 · Cited by 503
Cited by
Olshausen, B., Anderson, C., & Van Essen, D. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-11-04700.1993 · Cited by 908
Development and plasticity of cortical processing architectures
Singer, W. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5237.758 · Cited by 669
Neuronal Plasticity That Underlies Improvement in Perceptual Performance
Zohary, E., Celebrini, S., Britten, K. H., & Newsome, W. T. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8122114 · Cited by 247
Ohl, F. W., & Scheich, H. (1997) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s003590050150 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Pettet, M. W., & Gilbert, C. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 8366-8370
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2031787885
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.