Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hierarchical analysis of linkage disequilibrium in Rhizobium populations: evidence for sex?

Open access
Souza, V, Nguyen, T T, Hudson, R R, Piñero, D, Lenski, R E·1992·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Many bacterial species exhibit strong linkage disequilibrium of their chromosomal genes, which apparently indicates restricted recombination between alleles at different loci. The extent to which restricted recombination reflects limited migration between geographically isolated populations versus infrequent mixis of genotypes within populations is more difficult to determine. We examined the genetic structure of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli populations associated with wild and cultivated beans (Phaseolus spp.) over several spatial scales, ranging from individual host plants to throughout the Western Hemisphere. We observed significant linkage disequilibrium at scales at least as small as a cultivated plot. However, the amount of disequilibrium was much greater among isolates collected throughout the Western Hemisphere than among isolates from one area of Mexico, even when disequilibrium was quantified using an index that scales for allelic diversity. This finding suggests that limited migration between populations contributes substantially to linkage disequilibrium in Rhizobium. We also compared the genetic structure for R. leguminosarum bv. phaseoli taken from a cultivated plot with that for Escherichia coli obtained from one human host in an earlier study. Even at this fine scale, linkage disequilibrium in E. coli was very near the theoretical maximum level, whereas it was much less extreme in the local population of Rhizobium. Thus, the genetic structure for R. leguminosarum bv. phaseoli does not exclude the possibility of frequent mixis within local populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8389

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Souza, V, Nguyen, T. T., Hudson, R. R., Piñero, D., & Lenski, R. E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1992-09
Volume
89
Issue
17
Pages
8389-8393
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2133259672
Cited by
170
References
1
FWCI
14.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hierarchical analysis of linkage disequilibrium in Rhizobium populations: evidence for sex? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.17.8389
The paper
Souza, V, Nguyen, T. T., Hudson, R. R., Piñero, D., & Lenski, R. E. (1992). Hierarchical analysis of linkage disequilibrium in Rhizobium populations: evidence for sex? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.17.8389

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.