The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Origins of genes: "big bang" or continuous creation?
Open accessAbstract
Many protein families are common to all cellular organisms, indicating that many genes have ancient origins. Genetic variation is mostly attributed to processes such as mutation, duplication, and rearrangement of ancient modules. Thus it is widely assumed that much of present-day genetic diversity can be traced by common ancestry to a molecular "big bang." A rarely considered alternative is that proteins may arise continuously de novo. One mechanism of generating different coding sequences is by "overprinting," in which an existing nucleotide sequence is translated de novo in a different reading frame or from noncoding open reading frames. The clearest evidence for overprinting is provided when the original gene function is retained, as in overlapping genes. Analysis of their phylogenies indicates which are the original genes and which are their informationally novel partners. We report here the phylogenetic relationships of overlapping coding sequences from steroid-related receptor genes and from tymovirus, luteovirus, and lentivirus genomes. For each pair of overlapping coding sequences, one is confined to a single lineage, whereas the other is more widespread. This suggests that the phylogenetically restricted coding sequence arose only in the progenitor of that lineage by translating an out-of-frame sequence to yield the new polypeptide. The production of novel exons by alternative splicing in thyroid receptor and lentivirus genes suggests that introns can be a valuable evolutionary source for overprinting. New genes and their products may drive major evolutionary changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Activation of a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily by peroxisome proliferators
Issemann, I., & Green, S. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/347645a0 · Cited by 3,519
Gilbert, W. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/271501a0 · Cited by 2,300
Burgess Shale Faunas and the Cambrian Explosion
Morris, S. C. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.246.4928.339 · Cited by 211
Cited by
Poole, A. M., Jeffares, D. C., & Penny, D. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/pl00006275 · Cited by 274
Dynamically evolving novel overlapping gene as a factor in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
Nelson, C. W., Ardern, Z., Goldberg, T. L., Meng, C., Kuo, C.-H., Ludwig, C., Kolokotronis, S.-O., & Wei, X. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.59633 · Cited by 87
Comparative Analysis of RNA Families Reveals Distinct Repertoires for Each Domain of Life
Hoeppner, M. P., Gardner, P. P., & Poole, A. M. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002752 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Keese, P. K., & Gibbs, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1992-10-15
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 9489-9493
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2127501111
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Origins of genes: "big bang" or continuous creation? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.20.9489
- The paper
- Keese, P. K., & Gibbs, A. (1992). Origins of genes: "big bang" or continuous creation? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.20.9489
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.