The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On "genomenclature": a comprehensive (and respectful) taxonomy for pseudogenes and other "junk DNA".
Open accessAbstract
Genomic nomenclature has not kept pace with the levels and depth of analyzing and understanding genomic structure, function, and evolution. We wish to propose a general terminology that might aid the integrated study of evolution and molecular biology. Here we designate as a "nuon" any stretch of nucleic acid sequence that may be identifiable by any criterion. We show how such a general term will facilitate contemplation of the structural and functional contributions of such elements to the genome in its past, current, or future state. We focus in this paper on pseudogenes and dispersed repetitive elements, since their current names reflect the prevalent view that they constitute dispensable genomic noise (trash), rather than a vast repertoire of sequences with the capacity to shape an organism during evolution. This potential to contribute sequences for future use is reflected in the suggested terms "potonuons" or "potogenes." If such a potonuon has been coopted into a variant or novel function, an evolutionary process termed "exaptation," we employ the term "xaptonuon." If a potonuon remains without function (nonaptive nuon), it is a "nonaptation" and we term it "naptonuon." A number of examples for potonuons and xaptonuons are given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gilbert, W. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/271501a0 · Cited by 2,300
Cited by
Regulatory activities of transposable elements: from conflicts to benefits
Chuong, E. B., Elde, N. C., & Feschotte, C. (2017) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.139 · Cited by 1,489
DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes.
Feschotte, C., & Pritham, E. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090448 · Cited by 1,218
The origin of new genes: Glimpses from the young and old
Long, M., Betrán, E., Thornton, K., & Wang, W. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1204 · Cited by 933
Zalfa, F., Giorgi, M., Primerano, B., Moro, A., Di Penta, A., Reis, S., Oostra, B., & Bagni, C. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00079-5 · Cited by 676
Extrathymic Generation of Regulatory T Cells in Placental Mammals Mitigates Maternal-Fetal Conflict
Samstein, R. M., Josefowicz, S. Z., Arvey, A., Treuting, P. M., & Rudensky, A. Y. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.031 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Brosius, J., & Gould, S. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1992-11-15
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 10706-10710
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2034171197
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On "genomenclature": a comprehensive (and respectful) taxonomy for pseudogenes and other "junk DNA". https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.22.10706
- The paper
- Brosius, J., & Gould, S. J. (1992). On "genomenclature": a comprehensive (and respectful) taxonomy for pseudogenes and other "junk DNA". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.22.10706
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.