Cited by 219Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceSynthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds

Drug design by machine learning: the use of inductive logic programming to model the structure-activity relationships of trimethoprim analogues binding to dihydrofolate reductase.

Open access
King, R D, Muggleton, S, Lewis, R A, Sternberg, M J·1992·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The machine learning program GOLEM from the field of inductive logic programming was applied to the drug design problem of modeling structure-activity relationships. The training data for the program were 44 trimethoprim analogues and their observed inhibition of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase. A further 11 compounds were used as unseen test data. GOLEM obtained rules that were statistically more accurate on the training data and also better on the test data than a Hansch linear regression model. Importantly machine learning yields understandable rules that characterized the chemistry of favored inhibitors in terms of polarity, flexibility, and hydrogen-bonding character. These rules agree with the stereochemistry of the interaction observed crystallographically.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11322

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • King et al. (1992) use ILP to model structure-activity relationships for drug design.

    “For instance, King et al. (1992) use ILP to model structure-activity relationships for drug design.”

    From Inductive Logic Programming At 30: A New Introduction (2022) · cites this paper as King et al., 1992

  • ILP has been widely used for scientific discovery.

    “For this reason, ILP has been widely used for scientific discovery.”

    From Inductive Logic Programming At 30: A New Introduction (2022) · cites this paper as King et al., 1992

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, R. D., Muggleton, S., Lewis, R. A., & Sternberg, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Strathclyde (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1992-12
Volume
89
Issue
23
Pages
11322-11326
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2051589410
Cited by
219
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
18.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds
Keywords
dihydrofolate reductase, structure-activity relationship, inductive logic programming, Golem, drug design, enzyme inhibition, Escherichia coli, hydrogen bonding, molecular flexibility, stereochemistry, crystal structure
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Escherichia coli, Folic Acid Antagonists, Structure-Activity Relationship, Trimethoprim, Drug Design, Molecular Structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review