Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 473

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ablation of the prion protein (PrP) gene in mice prevents scrapie and facilitates production of anti-PrP antibodies.

Open access
Prusiner, S B, Groth, D, Serban, A, Koehler, R, Foster, D, Torchia, M, Burton, D, Yang, S L, DeArmond, S J·1993·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Mice, homozygous for prion protein (PrP) gene ablation (Prn-p0/0), develop normally and remain well > 500 days after inoculation with murine scrapie prions. In contrast, wild-type mice developed scrapie < 165 days after inoculation and most Prn-p0/+ mice, heterozygous for disruption of the PrP gene, exhibited signs of central nervous system dysfunction between 400 and 465 days after inoculation. In situ immunoblots showed widespread deposition of scrapie PrP (PrPSc) in the brains of both wild-type Prn-p+/+ and Prn-p0/+ mice, while neither cellular PrP (PrPC) nor PrPSc was detected in the brains of Prn-p0/0 mice. In contrast to Prn-p+/+ and Prn-p0/+ mice, Prn-p0/0 mice failed to propagate prion infectivity as measured by bioassays. Syrian hamster (SHa) PrP transgenes rendered Prn-p0/0 mice susceptible to prions containing SHaPrPSc. Immunization of Prn-p0/0 mice with purified, infectious mouse or SHa prions dispersed in Freund's adjuvant produced antisera that bound mouse, SHa, and human PrP on Western blots. Presumably, the lack of PrPC expression in Prn-p0/0 mice prevents them from becoming tolerant to the immunogen. The resistance of Prn-p0/0 mice to developing scrapie after inoculation with murine prions supports the hypothesis that PrPSc is essential for both transmission and pathogenesis of the prion diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10608

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 473

Metadata

Authors
Prusiner, S. B., Groth, D., Serban, A., Koehler, R., Foster, D., Torchia, M., Burton, D., Yang, S. L., & DeArmond, S. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1993-11-15
Volume
90
Issue
22
Pages
10608-10612
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2044004977
Cited by
473
References
39
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ablation of the prion protein (PrP) gene in mice prevents scrapie and facilitates production of anti-PrP antibodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.90.22.10608
The paper
Prusiner, S. B., Groth, D., Serban, A., Koehler, R., Foster, D., Torchia, M., Burton, D., Yang, S. L., & DeArmond, S. J. (1993). Ablation of the prion protein (PrP) gene in mice prevents scrapie and facilitates production of anti-PrP antibodies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.22.10608

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.