The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in angiosperms.
Open accessAbstract
Mechanical and ethological isolation between species is widespread in angiosperms with specialized animal-pollinated flowers, being recorded in 29 species groups belonging to 27 genera and 16 families. Mechanical isolation occurs in two forms. (i) The common type, designated the Salvia type, operates when two or more species of flowers are adapted for different groups of pollinators with different body sizes and shapes. (ii) In the Pedicularis type two flower species have the same species of pollinator but pick up pollen from different parts of the pollinator's body. Four forms of ethological isolation are recognized. (i) In the Aquilegia type, which is widespread, ethological isolation is a side effect of mechanical isolation. (ii) The flower-constancy type, as the name suggests, is based on flower-constant foraging behavior. (iii) In the Ophrys type, floral scents attract male bees or wasps and play a role in their mating behavior; different species of flowers, often orchids, have different scents and attract different sets of hymenopteran species. (iv) The monotropy type occurs in plants pollinated by hymenopterans with species-specific or group-specific flower preferences for nutritive purposes (monotropic and oligotropic bees and fig wasps). Three modes of origin of floral isolation are confirmed by evidence: (i) mechanical and ethological isolation arising as a by-product of allopatric speciation, (ii) ethological isolation developing by selection for reproductive isolation per se, and (iii) mechanical isolation arising as a by-product of character displacement. Mode of origin i accounts for the Salvia and Aquilegia types of isolation in nine known species groups and for the Ophrys type in one group. Mode of origin ii accounts for the flower-constancy type of ethological isolation in two species groups. Mode of origin iii explains mechanical isolation in two groups. Sympatric origin of floral isolation by hybrid speciation and by flower constancy has been proposed, but these modes are undocumented and improbable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers ( Mimulus )
Schemske, D. W., & Bradshaw, H. D. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.21.11910 · Cited by 821
The strength and genetic basis of reproductive isolating barriers in flowering plants
Lowry, D. B., Modliszewski, J. L., Wright, K. M., Wu, C. A., & Willis, J. H. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0064 · Cited by 496
Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives
Van der Niet, T., Peakall, R., & Johnson, S. D. (2014) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mct290 · Cited by 346
LEAKY PREZYGOTIC ISOLATION AND POROUS GENOMES: RAPID INTROGRESSION OF MATERNALLY INHERITED DNA
Chan, K. M. A., & Levin, S. A. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01748.x · Cited by 342
Real-time divergent evolution in plants driven by pollinators
Gervasi, D. D. L., & Schiestl, F. P. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14691 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Grant, V
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-01-04
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-10
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2015775149
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in angiosperms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.91.1.3
- The paper
- Grant, V. (1994). Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.1.3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.