The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Osmoprotective compounds in the Plumbaginaceae: a natural experiment in metabolic engineering of stress tolerance.
Open accessAbstract
In common with other zwitterionic quarternary ammonium compounds (QACs), glycine betaine acts as an osmoprotectant in plants, bacteria, and animals, with its accumulation in the cytoplasm reducing adverse effects of salinity and drought. For this reason, the glycine betaine biosynthesis pathway has become a target for genetic engineering of stress tolerance in crop plants. Besides glycine betaine, several other QAC osmoprotectants have been reported to accumulate among flowering plants, although little is known about their distribution, evolution, or adaptive value. We show here that various taxa of the highly stress-tolerant family Plumbaginaceae have evolved four QACs, which supplement or replace glycine betaine-namely, choline O-sulfate and the betaines of beta-alanine, proline, and hydroxyproline. Evidence from bacterial bioassays demonstrates that these QACs function no better than glycine betaine as osmoprotectants. However, the distribution of QACs among diverse members of the Plumbaginaceae adapted to different types of habitat indicates that different QACs could have selective advantages in particular stress environments. Specifically, choline O-sulfate can function in sulfate detoxification as well as in osmoprotection, beta-alanine betaine may be superior to glycine betaine in hypoxic saline conditions, and proline-derived betaines may be beneficial in chronically dry environments. We conclude that the evolution of osmoprotectant diversity within the Plumbaginaceae suggests additional possibilities to explore in the metabolic engineering of stress tolerance in crops.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant productivity and environment
Boyer, J. S. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.218.4571.443 · Cited by 3,959
Cited by
P LANT C ELLULAR AND M OLECULAR R ESPONSES TO H IGH S ALINITY
Hasegawa, P. M., Bressan, R. A., Zhu, J.-K., & Bohnert, H. J. (2000) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.463 · Cited by 4,590
Salinity tolerance in halophytes*
Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x · Cited by 2,789
Gupta, B., & Huang, B. (2014) · International Journal of Genomics · doi:10.1155/2014/701596 · Cited by 2,105
Yancey, P. H. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01730 · Cited by 1,868
Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt‐stress responses
Yang, Y., & Guo, Y. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14920 · Cited by 1,631
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanson, A. D., Rathinasabapathi, B., Rivoal, J., Burnet, M., Dillon, M. O., & Gage, D. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-01-04
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 306-310
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2044125068
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Osmoprotective compounds in the Plumbaginaceae: a natural experiment in metabolic engineering of stress tolerance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.91.1.306
- The paper
- Hanson, A. D., Rathinasabapathi, B., Rivoal, J., Burnet, M., Dillon, M. O., & Gage, D. A. (1994). Osmoprotective compounds in the Plumbaginaceae: a natural experiment in metabolic engineering of stress tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.1.306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.