The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reiterative responses to single strands of odor promote sustained upwind flight and odor source location by moths.
Open accessAbstract
We characterized single upwind surges of flying male Heliothis virescens moths in response to individual strands of pheromone generated experimentally in a wind tunnel. We then showed how this surge functions in this species as a basic 13.4-cm, 0.38-sec-long building block that is strung together repeatedly during typical male upwind flight in a normal pheromone plume. The template for a single iteration, complete with crosswind casting both before and after the straighter upwind surging portion, was exhibited by males flying upwind to pheromone and experiencing filament contacts just frequently enough to produce successful upwind flight to the source, as hypothesized by an earlier model. Also as predicted, with more frequent filament contact by males, only the straightest upwind portions of the surges were reiterated, producing direct upwind flight with little crosswind casting. Electroantennogram recordings made from males in free flight upwind in a normal point source pheromone plume further support the idea that a high frequency of filaments encountered under the usual pheromone plume conditions promotes only these repeated straight surges. In-flight electroantennogram recordings also showed that when filament contacts cease, the casting, counterturning program begins to be expressed after a latency period of 0.30 sec. Together these results provide a plausible explanation for how male and female moths, and maybe other insects, fly successfully upwind in an odor plume and locate the source of odor, using a surging-casting, phasic-tonic response to the onset and disappearance of each odor strand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction
Payne, T. L., BIRCH, M. C., & KENNEDY, C. E. J. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 527
Pheromone-Regulated Anemotaxis in Flying Moths
Kennedy, J. S., & Marsh, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.184.4140.999 · Cited by 348
Finding of a sex pheromone source by gypsy moths released in the field
David, C. T., Kennedy, J. S., & Ludlow, A. R. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/303804a0 · Cited by 202
Physiology and morphology of projection neurons in the antennal lobe of the male mothManduca sexta
Kanzaki, R., Arbas, E. A., Strausfeld, N. J., & Hildebrand, J. G. (1989) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/bf00611233 · Cited by 194
Odor-modulated upwind flight of the sphinx moth, Manduca sexta L.
Willis, M., & Arbas, E. (1991) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/bf00197655 · Cited by 179
Chemical Trail-Following by Flying Insects: A Mechanism for Orientation to a Distant Odor Source
Farkas, S. R., & Shorey, H. H. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.178.4056.67 · Cited by 116
Pheromone Source Location by Flying Moths: A Supplementary Non-Anemotactic Mechanism
Baker, T. C., & Kuenen, L. P. S. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.216.4544.424 · Cited by 81
Self-citationTrans-sexually grafted antennae alter pheromone-directed behaviour in a moth
Schneiderman, A. M., Hildebrand, J. G., Brennan, M. M., & Tumlinson, J. H. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323801a0 · Cited by 77
Baker, T. C., & Vogt, R. G. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.137.1.29 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Cited by
Navigational Strategies Used by Insects to Find Distant, Wind-Borne Sources of Odor
Cardé, R. T., & Willis, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-008-9484-5 · Cited by 483
Distributed odor source localization
Hayes, A. T., Martinoli, A., & Goodman, R. M. (2002) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2002.800682 · Cited by 451
Odour-plume dynamics influence the brain's olfactory code
Vickers, N. J., Christensen, T. A., Baker, T. C., & Hildebrand, J. G. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35068559 · Cited by 252
Self-citationFree-flight responses of Drosophila melanogaster to attractive odors
Budick, S. A., & Dickinson, M. H. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.02305 · Cited by 218
Plume-Tracking Behavior of Flying Drosophila Emerges from a Set of Distinct Sensory-Motor Reflexes
van Breugel, F., & Dickinson, M. H. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.023 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Vickers, N. J., & Baker, T. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-06-21
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5756-5760
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2035800106
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 28.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reiterative responses to single strands of odor promote sustained upwind flight and odor source location by moths. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.91.13.5756
- The paper
- Vickers, N. J., & Baker, T. C. (1994). Reiterative responses to single strands of odor promote sustained upwind flight and odor source location by moths. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.13.5756
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.