The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differential expression of homeobox genes in functionally distinct CD34+ subpopulations of human bone marrow cells.
Open accessAbstract
Class I homeobox (Hox) genes encode a major group of transcription factors controlling embryonic development and have been implicated in the continuing process of hematopoietic cell differentiation. They are clustered on four chromosomes and, in early development, exhibit spatially restricted expression with respect to their 3'-->5' chromosomal position. By using an improved PCR-based method for amplifying total cDNA derived from limited cell numbers, we now describe the expression of class I Hox genes in highly purified CD34+ cell subpopulations isolated from normal human bone marrow that represent functionally distinct stem and progenitor cell compartments. Our data indicate that at least 16 different Hox genes, mainly from the A and the B clusters, are expressed in one or more of these subpopulations of human hematopoietic cells. Moreover, markedly elevated expression of some of the Hox genes found at the 3' end of the A and B clusters (e.g., HoxB3) was a unique feature of the subpopulations that contained the most primitive functionally defined cells, whereas genes located in the 5' region of each cluster (e.g., HoxA10) were found to be expressed at nearly equal levels in the CD34+ subpopulations analyzed. In contrast to the findings for CD34+ cells, expression of two selected Hox genes, HoxB3 and HoxA10, was virtually extinguished in the CD34- fraction of bone marrow cells. These results demonstrate the expression of a broad range of Hox genes in primitive hematopoietic cells and point to the existence of a regulated program of Hox gene expression during their normal development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deconstructing stem cell self-renewal: genetic insights into cell-cycle regulation
Orford, K. W., & Scadden, D. T. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2269 · Cited by 851
Transcription Factors, Normal Myeloid Development, and Leukemia
Tenen, D. G., Hromas, R., Licht, J. D., & Zhang, D.-E. (1997) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v90.2.489 · Cited by 735
Kyba, M., Perlingeiro, R. C. R., & Daley, G. Q. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00680-3 · Cited by 655
Hoxa9 transforms primary bone marrow cells through specific collaboration with Meis1a but not Pbx1b
Kroon, E., Krosl, J., Thorsteinsdottir, U., Baban, S., Buchberg, A. M., & Sauvageau, G. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.13.3714 · Cited by 640
Self-citationThe transcriptional control of hematopoiesis [see comments]
Shivdasani, R., & Orkin, S. (1996) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v87.10.4025.bloodjournal87104025 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Sauvageau, G., Lansdorp, P. M., Eaves, C. J., Hogge, D. E., Dragowska, W. H., Reid, D. S., Largman, C., Lawrence, H. J., & Humphries, R. K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-12-06
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 12223-12227
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2095297122
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential expression of homeobox genes in functionally distinct CD34+ subpopulations of human bone marrow cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.91.25.12223
- The paper
- Sauvageau, G., Lansdorp, P. M., Eaves, C. J., Hogge, D. E., Dragowska, W. H., Reid, D. S., Largman, C., Lawrence, H. J., & Humphries, R. K. (1994). Differential expression of homeobox genes in functionally distinct CD34+ subpopulations of human bone marrow cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.25.12223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.