The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inactivation of gene expression in plants as a consequence of specific sequence duplication.
Open accessAbstract
Numerous examples now exist in plants where the insertion of multiple copies of a transgene leads to loss of expression of some or all copies of the transgene. Where the transgene contains sequences homologous to an endogenous gene, expression of both transgene and endogenous gene is sometimes found to be impaired. Several examples of these phenomena displaying different features are reviewed. Possible explanations for the observed phenomena are outlined, drawing on known cellular processes in Drosophila, fungi, and mammals as well as plants. It is hypothesized that duplicated sequences can, under certain circumstances, become involved in cycles of hybrid chromatin formation or other processes that generate the potential for modification of inherited chromatin structure and cytosine methylation patterns. These epigenetic changes could lead to altered transcription rates or altered efficiencies of mRNA maturation and export from the nucleus. Where the loss of gene expression is posttranscriptional, antisense RNA could be formed on accumulated, inefficiently processed RNAs by an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase or from a chromosomal promoter and cause the observed loss of homologous mRNAs and possibly the modification of homologous genes. It is suggested that the mechanisms evolved to help silence the many copies of transposable elements in plants. Multicopy genes that are part of the normal gene catalog of a plant species must have evolved to avoid these silencing mechanisms or their consequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Two classes of short interfering RNA in RNA silencing
Hamilton, A., Voinnet, O., Chappell, L., & Baulcombe, D. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdf464 · Cited by 809
Nathwani, A. C., Rosales, C., McIntosh, J., Rastegarlari, G., Nathwani, D., Raj, D., Nawathe, S., Waddington, S. N., Bronson, R., Jackson, S., et al. (2011) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2010.274 · Cited by 345
Creation of genomic methylation patterns
Bestor, T. H., & Tycko, B. (1996) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0496-363 · Cited by 310
Atanassova, R., Favet, N., Martz, F., Chabbert, B., Tollier, M., Monties, B., Fritig, B., & Legrand, M. (1995) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.8040465.x · Cited by 263
Epigenetic Silencing May Aid Evolution by Gene Duplication
Rodin, S. N., & Riggs, A. D. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s00239-002-2446-6 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Flavell, R. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-04-26
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3490-3496
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2044032739
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 73.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inactivation of gene expression in plants as a consequence of specific sequence duplication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.91.9.3490
- The paper
- Flavell, R. B. (1994). Inactivation of gene expression in plants as a consequence of specific sequence duplication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.9.3490
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.