The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A dominant-negative mutant of human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase affects cell recovery, apoptosis, and sister chromatid exchange following DNA damage.
Open accessAbstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase [PARP; NAD+ ADP-ribosyltransferase; NAD+:poly(adenosine-diphosphate-D-ribosyl)-acceptor ADP-D-ribosyltransferase, EC 2.4.2.30] is a zinc-dependent eukaryotic DNA-binding protein that specifically recognizes DNA strand breaks produced by various genotoxic agents. To study the biological function of this enzyme, we have established stable HeLa cell lines that constitutively produce the 46-kDa DNA-binding domain of human PARP (PARP-DBD), leading to the trans-dominant inhibition of resident PARP activity. As a control, a cell line was constructed, producing a point-mutated version of the DBD, which has no affinity for DNA in vitro. Expression of the PARP-DBD had only a slight effect on undamaged cells but had drastic consequences for cells treated with genotoxic agents. Exposure of cell lines expressing the wild-type (wt) or the mutated PARP-DBD, with low doses of N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) resulted in an increase in their doubling time, a G2 + M accumulation, and a marked reduction in cell survival. However, UVC irradiation had no preferential effect on the cell growth or viability of cell lines expressing the PARP-DBD. These PARP-DBD-expressing cells treated with MNNG presented the characteristic nucleosomal DNA ladder, one of the hallmarks of cell death by apoptosis. Moreover, these cells exhibited chromosomal instability as demonstrated by higher frequencies of both spontaneous and MNNG-induced sister chromatid exchanges. Surprisingly, the line producing the mutated DBD had the same behavior as those producing the wt DBD, indicating that the mechanism of action of the dominant-negative mutant involves more than its DNA-binding function. Altogether, these results strongly suggest that PARP is an element of the G2 checkpoint in mammalian cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Therapeutic Potential of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
Virág, L., & Szabó, C. (2002) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.54.3.375 · Cited by 1,373
Masson, M., Niedergang, C., Schreiber, V., Muller, S., Menissier-de Murcia, J., & de Murcia, G. (1998) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.18.6.3563 · Cited by 910
Self-citationDNA double-strand break repair: From mechanistic understanding to cancer treatment
HELLEDAY, T., LO, J., VANGENT, D., & ENGELWARD, B. (2007) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.006 · Cited by 640
Morales, J., Li, L., Fattah, F. J., Dong, Y., Bey, E. A., Patel, M., Gao, J., & Boothman, D. A. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression · doi:10.1615/critreveukaryotgeneexpr.2013006875 · Cited by 608
XRCC1 keeps DNA from getting stranded
Thompson, L. H., & West, M. G. (2000) · Mutation Research/DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/s0921-8777(99)00058-0 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Schreiber, V, Hunting, D., Trucco, C., Gowans, B., Grunwald, D., De Murcia, G., & De Murcia, J. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1995-05-23
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4753-4757
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2009661920
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A dominant-negative mutant of human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase affects cell recovery, apoptosis, and sister chromatid exchange following DNA damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.92.11.4753
- The paper
- Schreiber, V, Hunting, D., Trucco, C., Gowans, B., Grunwald, D., De Murcia, G., & De Murcia, J. M. (1995). A dominant-negative mutant of human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase affects cell recovery, apoptosis, and sister chromatid exchange following DNA damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.11.4753
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.