The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Two inducers of plant defense responses, 2,6-dichloroisonicotinec acid and salicylic acid, inhibit catalase activity in tobacco.
Open accessAbstract
2,6-Dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA) and salicylic acid (SA) are potent inducers of plant defense responses including the synthesis of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins and the development of enhanced disease resistance. A soluble SA-binding protein has been purified from tobacco with an affinity and specificity of binding that suggest it is a SA receptor. Recently, this protein has been shown to be a catalase whose enzymatic activity is inhibited by SA binding. We have proposed that the resulting increase in intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species plays a role in the induction of defense responses such as PR protein gene expression. Here we report that INA, like SA, binds the SA-binding protein/catalase and inhibits its enzymatic activity. In fact, the dose-response curves for inhibition of catalase by these two compounds are similar. Furthermore, the ability of both INA analogues and SA derivatives to bind and inhibit tobacco catalase correlates with their biological activity to induce PR-1 gene expression and enhance resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. Comparison of the structures of INA, SA, and their analogues reveals several common features that appear to be important for biological activity. Thus, these results not only suggest that INA and SA share the same mechanism of action that involves binding and inhibition of catalase but also further indicate an important role for reactive oxygen species in the induction of certain plant defense responses. This is supported by the demonstration that INA-mediated PR-1 gene activation is suppressed by antioxidants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE OXIDATIVE BURST IN PLANT DISEASE RESISTANCE
Lamb, C., & Dixon, R. A. (1997) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.251 · Cited by 3,213
Dual action of the active oxygen species during plant stress responses
Dat, J., Vandenabeele, S., Vranov�, E., Van Montagu, M., Inz� *, D., & Van Breusegem, F. (2000) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (CMLS) · doi:10.1007/s000180050041 · Cited by 1,904
Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses.
Hammond-Kosack, K. E., & Jones, J. D. (1996) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.8.10.1773 · Cited by 1,752
Oxidative burst: an early plant response to pathogen infection
WOJTASZEK, P. (1997) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj3220681 · Cited by 1,300
Priming in plant–pathogen interactions
Conrath, U., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Mauch-Mani, B. (2002) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02244-6 · Cited by 982
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Conrath, U., Chen, Z., Ricigliano, J. R., & Klessig, D. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 7143-7147
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2044577862
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two inducers of plant defense responses, 2,6-dichloroisonicotinec acid and salicylic acid, inhibit catalase activity in tobacco. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.92.16.7143
- The paper
- Conrath, U., Chen, Z., Ricigliano, J. R., & Klessig, D. F. (1995). Two inducers of plant defense responses, 2,6-dichloroisonicotinec acid and salicylic acid, inhibit catalase activity in tobacco. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.16.7143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.