The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Species specificity in the cell-free conversion of prion protein to protease-resistant forms: a model for the scrapie species barrier.
Open accessAbstract
Scrapie is a transmissible neurodegenerative disease that appears to result from an accumulation in the brain of an abnormal protease-resistant isoform of prion protein (PrP) called PrPsc. Conversion of the normal, protease-sensitive form of PrP (PrPc) to protease-resistant forms like PrPsc has been demonstrated in a cell-free reaction composed largely of hamster PrPc and PrPsc. We now report studies of the species specificity of this cell-free reaction using mouse, hamster, and chimeric PrP molecules. Combinations of hamster PrPc with hamster PrPsc and mouse PrPc with mouse PrPsc resulted in the conversion of PrPc to protease-resistant forms. Protease-resistant PrP species were also generated in the nonhomologous reaction of hamster PrPc with mouse PrPsc, but little conversion was observed in the reciprocal reaction. Glycosylation of the PrPc precursors was not required for species specificity in the conversion reaction. The relative conversion efficiencies correlated with the relative transmissibilities of these strains of scrapie between mice and hamsters. Conversion experiments performed with chimeric mouse/hamster PrPc precursors indicated that differences between PrPc and PrPsc at residues 139, 155, and 170 affected the conversion efficiency and the size of the resultant protease-resistant PrP species. We conclude that there is species specificity in the cell-free interactions that lead to the conversion of PrPc to protease-resistant forms. This specificity may be the molecular basis for the barriers to interspecies transmission of scrapie and other transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Harper, J. D., & Lansbury, P. T. (1997) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.385 · Cited by 1,652
Self-citationPrion Diseases of Humans and Animals: Their Causes and Molecular Basis
Collinge, J. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.519 · Cited by 1,344
Sensitive detection of pathological prion protein by cyclic amplification of protein misfolding
Saborio, G. P., Permanne, B., & Soto, C. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35081095 · Cited by 1,310
Direct Observation of the Interconversion of Normal and Toxic Forms of α-Synuclein
Cremades, N., Cohen, S. I. A., Deas, E., Abramov, A. Y., Chen, A. Y., Orte, A., Sandal, M., Clarke, R. W., Dunne, P., Aprile, F. A., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.037 · Cited by 911
Formation of native prions from minimal components in vitro
Deleault, N. R., Harris, B. T., Rees, J. R., & Supattapone, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702662104 · Cited by 631
Metadata
- Authors
- Kocisko, D. A., Priola, S. A., Raymond, G. J., Chesebro, B., Lansbury, P. T., & Caughey, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1995-04-25
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3923-3927
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2011108781
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Species specificity in the cell-free conversion of prion protein to protease-resistant forms: a model for the scrapie species barrier. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.92.9.3923
- The paper
- Kocisko, D. A., Priola, S. A., Raymond, G. J., Chesebro, B., Lansbury, P. T., & Caughey, B. (1995). Species specificity in the cell-free conversion of prion protein to protease-resistant forms: a model for the scrapie species barrier. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.9.3923
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.