The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination.
Open accessAbstract
Genomic double-strand breaks (DSBs) are key intermediates in recombination reactions of living organisms. We studied the repair of genomic DSBs by homologous sequences in plants. Tobacco plants containing a site for the highly specific restriction enzyme I-Sce I were cotransformed with Agrobacterium strains carrying sequences homologous to the transgene locus and, separately, containing the gene coding for the enzyme. We show that the induction of a DSB can increase the frequency of homologous recombination at a specific locus by up to two orders of magnitude. Analysis of the recombination products demonstrates that a DSB can be repaired via homologous recombination by at least two different but related pathways. In the major pathway, homologies on both sides of the DSB are used, analogous to the conservative DSB repair model originally proposed for meiotic recombination in yeast. Homologous recombination of the minor pathway is restricted to one side of the DSB as described by the nonconservative one-sided invasion model. The sequence of the recombination partners was absolutely conserved in two cases, whereas in a third case, a deletion of 14 bp had occurred, probably due to DNA polymerase slippage during the copy process. The induction of DSB breaks to enhance homologous recombination can be applied for a variety of approaches of plant genome manipulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution
Puchta, H. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eri025 · Cited by 601
Self-citationPrecision genome engineering and agriculture: opportunities and regulatory challenges
Voytas, D. F., & Gao, C. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001877 · Cited by 458
Capture of genomic and T-DNA sequences during double-strand break repair in somatic plant cells
Salomon, S. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.20.6086 · Cited by 355
Molecular genetics of DNA repair in higher plants
Britt, A. B. (1999) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(98)01355-7 · Cited by 313
Group II introns as controllable gene targeting vectors for genetic manipulation of bacteria
Karberg, M., Guo, H., Zhong, J., Coon, R., Perutka, J., & Lambowitz, A. M. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1201-1162 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- Puchta, H., Dujon, B., & Hohn, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1996-05-14
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5055-5060
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2015015564
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.10.5055
- The paper
- Puchta, H., Dujon, B., & Hohn, B. (1996). Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.10.5055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.