The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The activation of human gene MAGE-1 in tumor cells is correlated with genome-wide demethylation.
Open accessAbstract
Human gene MAGE-1 encodes tumor-specific antigens that are recognized on melanoma cells by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes. This gene is expressed in a significant proportion of tumors of various histological types, but not in normal tissues except male germ-line cells. We reported previously that reporter genes driven by the MAGE-1 promoter are active not only in the tumor cell lines that express MAGE-1 but also in those that do not. This suggests that the critical factor causing the activation of MAGE-1 in certain tumors is not the presence of the appropriate transcription factors. The two major MAGE-1 promoter elements have an Ets binding site, which contains a CpG dinucleotide. We report here that these CpG are demethylated in the tumor cell lines that express MAGE-1, and are methylated in those that do not express the gene. Methylation of these CpG inhibits the binding of transcription factors, as seen by mobility shift assay. Treatment with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine activated gene MAGE-1 not only in tumor cell lines but also in primary fibroblasts. Finally, the overall level of CpG methylation was evaluated in 20 different tumor cell lines. It was inversely correlated with the expression of MAGE-1. We conclude that the activation of MAGE-1 in cancer cells is due to the demethylation of the promoter. This appears to be a consequence of a genome-wide demethylation process that occurs in many cancers and is correlated with tumor progression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The essentials of DNA methylation
Bird, A. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90526-i · Cited by 948
Cited by
DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory
Bird, A. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.947102 · Cited by 7,124
DNA methylation in cancer: too much, but also too little
Ehrlich, M. (2002) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1205651 · Cited by 1,538
Cancer/testis antigens: an expanding family of targets for cancer immunotherapy
Scanlan., M. J., Gure., A. O., Jungbluth., A. A., Old., L. J., & Chen., Y. (2002) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1034/j.1600-065x.2002.18803.x · Cited by 873
DNA hypomethylation and human diseases
Wilson, A. S., Power, B. E., & Molloy, P. L. (2007) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2006.08.007 · Cited by 804
Cancer as a dysregulated epigenome allowing cellular growth advantage at the expense of the host
Timp, W., & Feinberg, A. P. (2013) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3486 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- De Smet, C., De Backer, O., Faraoni, I., Lurquin, C., Brasseur, F., & Boon, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1996-07-09
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 7149-7153
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2109047753
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The activation of human gene MAGE-1 in tumor cells is correlated with genome-wide demethylation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.14.7149
- The paper
- De Smet, C., De Backer, O., Faraoni, I., Lurquin, C., Brasseur, F., & Boon, T. (1996). The activation of human gene MAGE-1 in tumor cells is correlated with genome-wide demethylation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.14.7149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.