Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 525

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subcellular colocalization of the cellular and scrapie prion proteins in caveolae-like membranous domains

Open access
Vey, Martin, Pilkuhn, Susanne, Wille, Holger, Nixon, Randal, DeArmond, Stephen J., Smart, Eric J., Anderson, Richard G. W., Taraboulos, Albert, Prusiner, Stanley B.·1996·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Results of transgenetic studies argue that the scrapie isoform of the prion protein (PrP Sc ) interacts with the substrate cellular PrP (PrP C ) during conversion into nascent PrP Sc . While PrP Sc appears to accumulate primarily in lysosomes, caveolae-like domains (CLDs) have been suggested to be the site where PrP C is converted into PrP Sc . We report herein that CLDs isolated from scrapie-infected neuroblastoma (ScN2a) cells contain PrP C and PrP Sc . After lysis of ScN2a cells in ice-cold Triton X-100, both PrP isoforms and an N-terminally truncated form of PrP C (PrP C -II) were found concentrated in detergent-insoluble complexes resembling CLDs that were isolated by flotation in sucrose gradients. Similar results were obtained when CLDs were purified from plasma membranes by sonication and gradient centrifugation; with this procedure no detergents are used, which minimizes artifacts that might arise from redistribution of proteins among subcellular fractions. The caveolar markers ganglioside GM1 and H-ras were found concentrated in the CLD fractions. When plasma membrane proteins were labeled with the impermeant reagent sulfo- N -hydroxysuccinimide-biotin, both PrP C and PrP Sc were found biotinylated in CLD fractions. Similar results on the colocalization of PrP C and PrP Sc were obtained when CLDs were isolated from Syrian hamster brains. Our findings demonstrate that both PrP C and PrP Sc are present in CLDs and, thus, support the hypothesis that the PrP Sc formation occurs within this subcellular compartment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14945

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 525

Metadata

Authors
Vey, M., Pilkuhn, S., Wille, H., Nixon, R., DeArmond, S. J., Smart, E. J., Anderson, R. G. W., Taraboulos, A., & Prusiner, S. B.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1996-12-10
Volume
93
Issue
25
Pages
14945-14949
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2081852339
Cited by
525
References
1
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subcellular colocalization of the cellular and scrapie prion proteins in caveolae-like membranous domains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.25.14945
The paper
Vey, M., Pilkuhn, S., Wille, H., Nixon, R., DeArmond, S. J., Smart, E. J., Anderson, R. G. W., Taraboulos, A., & Prusiner, S. B. (1996). Subcellular colocalization of the cellular and scrapie prion proteins in caveolae-like membranous domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.25.14945

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.