The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The rate constant of photoinhibition, measured in lincomycin-treated leaves, is directly proportional to light intensity.
Open accessAbstract
Pumpkin leaves grown under high light (500-700 micromol of photons m-2.s-1) were illuminated under photon flux densities ranging from 6.5 to 1500 micromol.m-2.s-1 in the presence of lincomycin, an inhibitor of chloroplast protein synthesis. The illumination at all light intensities caused photoinhibition, measured as a decrease in the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence. Loss of photosystem II (PSII) electron transfer activity correlated with the decrease in the fluorescence ratio. The rate constant of photoinhibition, determined from first-order fits, was directly proportional to photon flux density at all light intensities studied. The fluorescence ratio did not decrease if the leaves were illuminated in low light in the absence of lincomycin or incubated in darkness in the presence of lincomycin. The constancy of the quantum yield of photoinhibition under different photon flux densities strongly suggests that photoinhibition in vivo occurs by one dominant mechanism under all light intensities. This mechanism probably is not the acceptor side mechanism characterized in the anaerobic case in vitro. Furthermore, there was an excellent correlation between the loss of PSII activity and the loss of the D1 protein from thylakoid membranes under low light. At low light, photoinhibition occurs so slowly that inactive PSII centers with the D1 protein waiting to be degraded do not accumulate. The kinetic agreement between D1 protein degradation and the inactivation of PSII indicates that the turnover of the D1 protein depends on photoinhibition under both low and high light.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4
LAEMMLI, U. K. (1970) · Nature · doi:10.1038/227680a0 · Cited by 249,961
Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., & Gordon, J. (1979) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350 · Cited by 53,385
Raza, H., John, A., & Nemmar, A. (2013) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000350087 · Cited by 47,221
Photoinhibition of Photosystem II. Inactivation, protein damage and turnover
Aro, E.-M., Virgin, I., & Andersson, B. (1993) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/0005-2728(93)90134-2 · Cited by 2,366
Self-citationVass, I., Styring, S., Hundal, T., Koivuniemi, A., Aro, E., & Andersson, B. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.4.1408 · Cited by 519
Self-citationPhotoinhibition of Chloroplast Reactions. I. Kinetics and Action Spectra
Jones, L. W., & Kok, B. (1966) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.41.6.1037 · Cited by 421
Photoinhibition and D1 Protein Degradation in Peas Acclimated to Different Growth Irradiances
Aro, E. M., McCaffery, S., & Anderson, J. M. (1993) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.103.3.835 · Cited by 335
Self-citationRuban, A. V., Young, A. J., & Horton, P. (1993) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.102.3.741 · Cited by 221
Peterson, L. W., & Huffaker, R. C. (1975) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.55.6.1009 · Cited by 203
Russell, A. W., Critchley, C., Robinson, S. A., Franklin, L. A., Seaton, G. G. R., Chow, W. S., Anderson, J. M., & Osmond, C. B. (1995) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.107.3.943 · Cited by 140
Cited by
Ruban, A. V. (2016) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.15.01935 · Cited by 1,016
Frequently asked questions about in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence: practical issues
Kalaji, H. M., Schansker, G., Ladle, R. J., Goltsev, V., Bosa, K., Allakhverdiev, S. I., Brestic, M., Bussotti, F., Calatayud, A., Dąbrowski, P., et al. (2014) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-014-0024-6 · Cited by 832
Melis, A. (1999) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(99)01387-4 · Cited by 757
Molecular mechanisms of photodamage in the Photosystem II complex
Vass, I. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.04.014 · Cited by 398
Keren, N., Berg, A., van Kan, P. J. M., Levanon, H., & Ohad, I. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.4.1579 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Tyystjärvi, E., & Aro, E. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1996-03-05
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2213-2218
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2089021793
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The rate constant of photoinhibition, measured in lincomycin-treated leaves, is directly proportional to light intensity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.5.2213
- The paper
- Tyystjärvi, E., & Aro, E. M. (1996). The rate constant of photoinhibition, measured in lincomycin-treated leaves, is directly proportional to light intensity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.5.2213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.