Folding funnels and energy landscapes of larger proteins within the capillarity approximation
Open accessAbstract
The characterization of protein-folding kinetics with increasing chain length under various thermodynamic conditions is addressed using the capillarity picture in which distinct spatial regions of the protein are imagined to be folded or trapped and separated by interfaces. The quantitative capillarity theory is based on the nucleation theory of first-order transitions and the droplet analysis of glasses and random magnets. The concepts of folding funnels and rugged energy landscapes are shown to be applicable in the large size limit just as for smaller proteins. An ideal asymptotic free-energy profile as a function of a reaction coordinate measuring progress down the funnel is shown to be quite broad. This renders traditional transition state theory generally inapplicable but allows a diffusive picture with a transition-state region to be used. The analysis unifies several scaling arguments proposed earlier. The importance of fluctuational fine structure both to the free-energy profile and to the glassy dynamics is highlighted. The fluctuation effects lead to a very broad trapping-time distribution. Considerations necessary for understanding the crossover between the mean field and capillarity pictures of the energy landscapes are discussed. A variety of mechanisms that may roughen the interfaces and may lead to a complex structure of the transition-state ensemble are proposed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Protein folding exhibits irreversible fates and fitness landscapes, whereas irreversibility is rarely quantified in population genetics, where traditional models are fundamentally time reversible.
“Like development, protein folding exhibits irreversible fates (184, 185) and fitness landscapes (186–189), whereas irreversibility is rarely quantified in population genetics, where traditional models are fundamentally time reversible (190).”
From Topological Approaches in Animal Comparative Genomics (2026) · cites this paper as [186]
The introduction (p. 1) describes an energy landscape and folding funnel for proteins, and the discussion (p. 5) describes molecules taking different folding paths or becoming trapped. These passages do not establish irreversible fates or call the protein-folding landscape a fitness landscape. The population-genetics comparison is attached to a different citation, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: Statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications
Bouchaud, J.-P., & Georges, A. (1990) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(90)90099-n · Cited by 4,162 · see citing works
Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis
Bryngelson, J. D., Onuchic, J. N., Socci, N. D., & Wolynes, P. G. (1995) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340210302 · Cited by 2,648 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [1]Bryngelson, J. D. & Wolynes, P. G. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 7524-7528.
- [3]Leopold, P. E., Montal, M. & Onuchic, J. N. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 8721-8725.
- [4]Onuchic, J. N., Wolynes, P. G., Luthey-Schulten, Z. & Socci, N. D. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3626-3630.
- [19]Wolynes, P. G. (1988) in Proceedings International Symposium on Frontiers in Science , eds. Chan, S. & DeBrunner, P. G. (Hans Frauenfelder Festschrift) (Am. Inst. Physics, New York), pp. 39-65.
- [25]Rowlinson, J. T. & Widom, B. (1982) Molecular Theory of Capillarity (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
- [27]Hagen, S. J., Hofrichter, J., Szabo, A. & Eaton, W. A. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11615-11617.
- [33]Takada, S. & Wolynes, P. G. (1996) Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. , in press.
- [36]Panchenko, A. R., Luthey-Schulten, Z. & Wolynes, P. G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 2008-2013.
- [37]Shoemaker, B. J., Wang, J. & Wolynes, P. G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 777-782.
- [41]Kiefhaber, T. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 9029-9033.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Laughlin, R. B., Pines, D., Schmalian, J., Stojković, B. P., & Wolynes, P. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.1.32 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Self-citationFerreiro, D. U., Komives, E. A., & Wolynes, P. G. (2014) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583514000092 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantifying the topography of the intrinsic energy landscape of flexible biomolecular recognition
Chu, X., Gan, L., Wang, E., & Wang, J. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1220699110 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Topological Approaches in Animal Comparative Genomics
Schultz, D. T., & Simakov, O. (2026) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-030424-084541 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wolynes, P. G.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wolynes, Peter G.
- ORCID
- Wolynes, Peter G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1997-06-10
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6170-6175
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC21021
- OpenAlex
- W2075973109
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM044557)
- Fogarty International Center
- Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
- Keywords
- protein folding, folding funnel, energy landscape, capillarity approximation, nucleation theory, first-order phase transition, droplet analysis, random magnets, glassy dynamics, free energy profiles, transition state theory, fluctuation effects, scaling arguments, mean-field theory, transition state ensemble, chain length dependence
- MeSH terms
- Capillary Action, Models, Molecular, Models, Structural, Models, Theoretical, Muramidase, Proteins, Thermodynamics, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Folding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review