The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize
Abstract
It has long been suspected that maize is the product of an historical tetraploid event. Several observations support this possibility, including the fact that the maize genome contains duplicated chromosomal segments with colinear gene arrangements. Some of the genes from these duplicated segments have been sequenced. In this study, we examine the pattern of sequence divergence among 14 pairs of duplicated genes. We compare the pattern of divergence to patterns predicted by four models of the evolution of the maize genome—autotetraploidy, genomic allotetraploidy, segmental allotetraploidy, and multiple segmental duplications. Our analyses indicate that coalescent times for duplicated sequences fall into two distinct groups, corresponding to roughly 20.5 and 11.4 million years. This observation strongly discounts the possibility that the maize genome is the product of a genomic allotetraploid event, and it is also difficult to reconcile with either autotetraploidy or multiple independent segmental duplications. However, the presence of two (and only two) coalescent times is predicted by the segmental allotetraploid model. If the maize genome is the product of a segmental allotetraploid event, as these data suggest, then its two diploid progenitors diverged roughly 20.5 million years ago (Mya), and the allotetraploid event probably occurred approximately 11.4 Mya. Comparison of maize and sorghum sequences suggests that one of the two ancestral diploids shares a more recent common ancestor with sorghum than it does with the other ancestral diploid.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maize is an 11.4 M ya paleo-polyploid, allo-tetraploid switchgrass formed 4-6 M ya, and allo-hexaploid bread wheat arose about 8 k ya.
“For example, maize is an 11.4 M ya paleo-polyploid (Gaut and Doebley, 1997), allo-tetraploid switchgrass formed 4–6 M ya (Lovell et al., 2021b), and allo-hexaploid bread wheat arose about 8 k ya (Haas et al., 2019).”
From GENESPACE tracks regions of interest and gene copy number variation across multiple genomes (2022) · cites this paper as Gaut and Doebley, 1997
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- R P Celarier Rhodora 58, 135–143 (1956).
- E Anderson Chron Bot 9, 88–92 (1945).
- E D Garber Univ Calif Pub Bot 23, 283–362 (1950).
- 10.1086/281658 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110839 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/118.2.353 · DOI
- M M Rhoades Corn and Corn Improvement, ed G F Sprague (Academic, New York), pp. 123–219 (1955).
- 10.1093/genetics/132.4.1119 · DOI
- G L Stebbins Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants (Arnold, London, 1971).
- 10.1093/genetics/141.2.785 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11735 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3338 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3377 · DOI
- M Nei, T Gojobori Mol Biol Evol 3, 418–426 (1986).
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025549 · DOI
- S V Muse, B S Gaut Mol Biol Evol 11, 715–724 (1994).
- R R Sokal, F J Rholf Biometry (Freeman, New York, 1995).
- 10.1093/genetics/142.3.1021 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/138.3.849 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.93.19.10274 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02857419 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6201 · DOI
- W-H Li, D Graur Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA), pp. 69 (1991).
- 10.1093/genetics/146.1.393 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.71.7.2848 · DOI
- W-H Li Population Genetics and Molecular Evolution, eds T Ohta, K Aoki (Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo), pp. 333–352 (1985).
- 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5095 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.88.14.5974 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02100204 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7719 · DOI
- 10.1080/07352689309701903 · DOI
- 10.7312/steb94536 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
A Recent Polyploidy Superimposed on Older Large-Scale Duplications in the Arabidopsis Genome
Blanc, G., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.751803 · Cited by 724
GENESPACE tracks regions of interest and gene copy number variation across multiple genomes
Lovell, J. T., Sreedasyam, A., Schranz, M. E., Wilson, M., Carlson, J. W., Harkess, A., Emms, D., Goodstein, D. M., & Schmutz, J. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.78526 · Cited by 391
Dong, Z., Danilevskaya, O., Abadie, T., Messina, C., Coles, N., & Cooper, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043450 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaut, B. S., & Doebley, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Department of Plant Sciences and Center for Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903; and Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1997-06-24
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 6809-6814
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review