Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cancer-associated mutations at the INK4a locus cancel cell cycle arrest by p16 INK4a but not by the alternative reading frame protein p19 ARF

Open access
Quelle, Dawn E., Cheng, Mangeng, Ashmun, Richard A., Sherr, Charles J.·1997·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The INK4a gene, one of the most frequently disrupted tumor suppressor loci in human cancer, encodes two unrelated proteins, p16 INK4a and p19 ARF , each of which is capable of inducing cell cycle arrest. Splicing of alternative first exons (1α vs. 1β) to a common second exon within INK4a generates mRNAs in which exon 2 sequences are translated in two different reading frames. One of the products, the cyclin D-dependent kinase inhibitor p16 INK4a , is functionally inactivated by mutations or deletions in a wide variety of cancers. However, because many such mutations reside in exon 2, they also affect the alternative reading frame (ARF) protein. To determine whether such mutations disrupt p19 ARF function, we introduced naturally occurring missense mutations into mouse INK4a exon 2 sequences and tested mutant p16 INK4a and p19 ARF proteins for their ability to inhibit cell cycle progression. Six p19 ARF point mutants remained fully active in mediating cell cycle arrest in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, whereas two of the corresponding mutations within p16 INK4a resulted in complete loss of activity. Analysis of p19 ARF deletion mutants indicated that the unique aminoterminal domain encoded by exon 1β was both necessary and sufficient for inducing G 1 arrest. Therefore, cancer-associated mutations within exon 2 of the INK4a gene specifically target p16 INK4a , and not p19 ARF , for inactivation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.94.2.669

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Quelle, D. E., Cheng, M., Ashmun, R. A., & Sherr, C. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1997-01-21
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
669-673
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2021015704
Cited by
220
References
5
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer-associated mutations at the INK4a locus cancel cell cycle arrest by p16 INK4a but not by the alternative reading frame protein p19 ARF. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.2.669
The paper
Quelle, D. E., Cheng, M., Ashmun, R. A., & Sherr, C. J. (1997). Cancer-associated mutations at the INK4a locus cancel cell cycle arrest by p16 INK4a but not by the alternative reading frame protein p19 ARF. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.2.669

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.