The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences
Open accessAbstract
An important but controversial class of hypotheses concerning the evolution of female preferences for extreme male mating displays involves “indirect selection.” Even in the absence of direct fitness effects, preference for males with high overall fitness can spread via a genetic correlation that develops between preference alleles and high fitness genotypes. Here we develop a quantitative expression for the force of indirect selection that (i) applies to any female mating behavior, (ii) is relatively insensitive to the underlying genetics, and (iii) is based on measurable quantities. In conjunction with the limited data now available, it suggests that the evolutionary force generated by indirect selection on preferences is weak in absolute terms. This finding raises the possibility that direct selection on preference genes may often be more important than indirect selection, but more data on the quantities identified by our model and on direct selection are needed to decide the question.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
THE EVOLUTION OF ONE- AND TWO-LOCUS SYSTEMS
Nagylaki, T. (1976) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/83.3.583 · Cited by 142
Cited by
The Role of Reinforcement in Speciation: Theory and Data
Servedio, M. R., & Noor, M. A. F. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132412 · Cited by 939
Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems
Kokko, H., & Rankin, D. J. (2006) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1784 · Cited by 722
Speciation by Natural and Sexual Selection: Models and Experiments
Kirkpatrick, M., & Ravigné, V. (2002) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/338370 · Cited by 586
Self-citationSex Peptide Causes Mating Costs in Female Drosophila melanogaster
Wigby, S., & Chapman, T. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.051 · Cited by 498
Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection
Mead, L. S., & Arnold, S. J. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.003 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirkpatrick, M., & Barton, N. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1997-02-18
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1282-1286
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1965867263
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.4.1282
- The paper
- Kirkpatrick, M., & Barton, N. H. (1997). The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.4.1282
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.