Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vivo 13 C NMR measurements of cerebral glutamine synthesis as evidence for glutamate–glutamine cycling

Open access
Sibson, N. R., Dhankhar, A., Mason, G. F., Behar, K. L., Rothman, D. L., Shulman, R. G.·1997·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The cerebral tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle rate and the rate of glutamine synthesis were measured in rats in vivo under normal physiological and hyperammonemic conditions using 13 C NMR spectroscopy. In the hyperammonemic animals, blood ammonia levels were raised from control values of ≈0.05 mM to ≈0.35 mM by an intravenous ammonium acetate infusion. Once a steady-state of cerebral metabolites was established, a [1- 13 C]glucose infusion was initiated, and 13 C NMR spectra acquired continuously on a 7- tesla spectrometer to monitor 13 C labeling of cerebral metabolites. The time courses of glutamate and glutamine C-4 labeling were fitted to a mathematical model to yield TCA cycle rate ( V TCA ) and the flux from glutamate to glutamine through the glutamine synthetase pathway ( V gln ). Under hyperammonemia the value of V TCA was 0.57 ± 0.16 μmol/min per g (mean ± SD, n = 6) and was not significantly different (unpaired t test; P > 0.10) from that measured in the control animals (0.46 ± 0.12 μmol/min per g, n = 5). Therefore, the TCA cycle rate was not significantly altered by hyperammonemia. The measured rate of glutamine synthesis under hyperammonemia was 0.43 ± 0.14 μmol/min per g (mean ± SD, n = 6), which was significantly higher (unpaired t test; P < 0.01) than that measured in the control group (0.21 ± 0.04 μmol/min per g, n = 5). We propose that the majority of the glutamine synthetase flux under normal physiological conditions results from neurotransmitter substrate cycling between neurons and glia. Under hyperammonemia the observed increase in glutamine synthesis is comparable to the expected increase in ammonia transport into the brain and reported measurements of glutamine efflux under such conditions. Thus, under conditions of elevated plasma ammonia an increase in the rate of glutamine synthesis occurs as a means of ammonia detoxification, and this is superimposed on the constant rate of neurotransmitter cycling through glutamine synthetase.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2699

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Sibson, N. R., Dhankhar, A., Mason, G. F., Behar, K. L., Rothman, D. L., & Shulman, R. G.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1997-03-18
Volume
94
Issue
6
Pages
2699-2704
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2064898829
Cited by
320
References
33
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo 13 C NMR measurements of cerebral glutamine synthesis as evidence for glutamate–glutamine cycling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.6.2699
The paper
Sibson, N. R., Dhankhar, A., Mason, G. F., Behar, K. L., Rothman, D. L., & Shulman, R. G. (1997). In vivo 13 C NMR measurements of cerebral glutamine synthesis as evidence for glutamate–glutamine cycling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.6.2699

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.