The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of the primate lineage leading to modern humans: Phylogenetic and demographic inferences from DNA sequences
Open accessAbstract
To date major divergences that occurred in the primate lineage leading to modern humans and to infer a demographic parameter (effective population size) of the ancestral lineage that existed at each divergence, a maximum likelihood method was applied to autosomal DNA sequence data currently available for pairs of orthologous genes between the human and each of the chimpanzee, gorilla, Old World monkey (OWM), and New World monkey (NWM). A statistical test is carried out to support the assumption that silent substitutions have accumulated in a clock-like fashion over loci between primate taxa or even among sites within a locus. It is shown that the human ancestral lineage became distinct from the NWM 57.5 million years (Myr) ago, the OWM 31 Myr ago, the gorilla 8.0 Myr ago, and the chimpanzee 4.5 Myr ago, and that the effective population size at these divergences was generally much greater than that of modern humans. It is argued that the human ancestral lineage branched off from the NWM and OWM earlier than once thought and that significant demographic changes might have occurred at different evolutionary stages, particularly at the hominid stage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1985) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101694 · Cited by 8,687
The molecular clock runs more slowly in man than in apes and monkeys
Li, W.-H., & Tanimura, M. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/326093a0 · Cited by 375
Rates of Nucleotide Substitution in Primates and Rodents and the Generation–Time Effect Hypothesis
Li, W.-H., Ellsworth, D. L., Krushkal, J., Chang, B. H.-J., & Hewett-Emmett, D. (1996) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1006/mpev.1996.0012 · Cited by 335
Cited by
Inferring human population size and separation history from multiple genome sequences
Schiffels, S., & Durbin, R. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3015 · Cited by 1,073
Revising the human mutation rate: implications for understanding human evolution
Scally, A., & Durbin, R. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3295 · Cited by 610
Wu, C.-I., & Ting, C.-T. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1269 · Cited by 532
Estimation of primate speciation dates using local molecular clocks.
Yoder, A. D., & Yang, Z. (2000) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026389 · Cited by 494
Evolution and ecology of MHC molecules: from genomics to sexual selection
Edwards, S. V., & Hedrick, P. W. (1998) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01416-5 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Takahata, N., & Satta, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1997-04-29
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4811-4815
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2005500023
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of the primate lineage leading to modern humans: Phylogenetic and demographic inferences from DNA sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.9.4811
- The paper
- Takahata, N., & Satta, Y. (1997). Evolution of the primate lineage leading to modern humans: Phylogenetic and demographic inferences from DNA sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.9.4811
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.