Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Osmolyte-driven contraction of a random coil protein

Open access
Qu, Youxing, Bolen, C. L., Bolen, D. W.·1998·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The Stokes radius characteristics of reduced and carboxamidated ribonuclease A (RCAM RNase) were determined for transfer of this “random coil” protein from water to 1 M concentrations of the naturally occurring protecting osmolytes trimethylamine N -oxide, sarcosine, sucrose, and proline and the nonprotecting osmolyte urea. The denatured ensemble of RCAM RNase expands in urea and contracts in protecting osmolytes to extents proportional to the transfer Gibbs energy of the protein from water to osmolyte. This proportionality suggests that the sum of the transfer Gibbs energies of individual parts of the protein is responsible for the dimensional changes in the denatured ensemble. The dominant term in the transfer Gibbs energy of RCAM RNase from water to protecting osmolytes is the unfavorable interaction of the osmolyte with the peptide backbone, whereas the favorable interaction of urea with the backbone dominates in RCAM RNase transfer to urea. The side chains collectively favor transfer to the osmolytes, with some protecting osmolytes solubilizing hydrophobic side chains as well as urea does, a result suggesting there is nothing special about the ability of urea to solubilize hydrophobic groups. Protecting osmolytes stabilize proteins by raising the chemical potential of the denatured ensemble, and the uniform thermodynamic force acting on the peptide backbone causes the collateral effect of contracting the denatured ensemble. The contraction decreases the conformational entropy of the denatured state while increasing the density of hydrophobic groups, two effects that also contribute to the ability of protecting osmolytes to force proteins to fold.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9268

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Qu, Y., Bolen, C. L., & Bolen, D. W.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1998-08-04
Volume
95
Issue
16
Pages
9268-9273
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2043750499
Cited by
276
References
26
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Osmolyte-driven contraction of a random coil protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.16.9268
The paper
Qu, Y., Bolen, C. L., & Bolen, D. W. (1998). Osmolyte-driven contraction of a random coil protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.16.9268

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.