Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 418

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mineralocorticoid receptor knockout mice: Pathophysiology of Na + metabolism

Open access
Berger, Stefan, Bleich, Markus, Schmid, Wolfgang, Cole, Timothy J., Peters, Jörg, Watanabe, Haruko, Kriz, Wilhelm, Warth, Richard, Greger, Rainer, Schütz, Günther·1998·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR)-deficient mice were generated by gene targeting. These animals had a normal prenatal development. During the first week of life, MR-deficient (−/−) mice developed symptoms of pseudohypoaldosteronism. They finally lost weight and eventually died at around day 10 after birth from dehydration by renal sodium and water loss. At day 8, −/− mice showed hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, and a strong increase in renin, angiotensin II, and aldosterone plasma concentrations. Methods were established to measure renal clearance and colonic transepithelial Na + reabsorption in 8-day-old mice in vivo . The fractional renal Na + excretion was elevated >8-fold. The glomerular filtration rate in −/− mice was not different from controls. The effect of amiloride on renal Na + excretion and colonic transepithelial voltage reflects the function of amiloide-sensitive epithelial Na + channels (ENaC). In −/− mice, it was reduced to 24% in the kidney and to 16% in the colon. There was, however, still significant residual ENaC-mediated Na + reabsorption in both epithelia. RNase protection analysis of the subunits of ENaC and (Na + + K + )-ATPase did not reveal a decrease in −/− mice. The present data indicate that MR-deficient neonates die because they are not able to compensate renal Na + loss. Regulation of Na + reabsorption via MR is not achieved by transcriptional control of ENaC and (Na + + K + )-ATPase in RNA abundance but by transcriptional control of other as yet unidentified genes. MR knockout mice will be a suitable tool for the search of these genes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9424

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 418

Metadata

Authors
Berger, S., Bleich, M., Schmid, W., Cole, T. J., Peters, J., Watanabe, H., Kriz, W., Warth, R., Greger, R., & Schütz, G.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1998-08-04
Volume
95
Issue
16
Pages
9424-9429
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1988909210
Cited by
418
References
2
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mineralocorticoid receptor knockout mice: Pathophysiology of Na + metabolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.16.9424
The paper
Berger, S., Bleich, M., Schmid, W., Cole, T. J., Peters, J., Watanabe, H., Kriz, W., Warth, R., Greger, R., & Schütz, G. (1998). Mineralocorticoid receptor knockout mice: Pathophysiology of Na + metabolism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.16.9424

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.