The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conformational gating of the electron transfer reaction Q A − ⋅ Q B → Q A Q B − ⋅ in bacterial reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides determined by a driving force assay
Open accessAbstract
The mechanism of the electron transfer reaction, Q A − ⋅ Q B → Q A Q B − ⋅ , was studied in isolated reaction centers from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides by replacing the native Q 10 in the Q A binding site with quinones having different redox potentials. These substitutions are expected to change the intrinsic electron transfer rate by changing the redox free energy (i.e., driving force) for electron transfer without affecting other events that may be associated with the electron transfer (e.g., protein dynamics or protonation). The electron transfer from Q A − ⋅ to Q B was measured by three independent methods: a functional assay involving cytochrome c 2 to measure the rate of Q A − ⋅ oxidation, optical kinetic spectroscopy to measure changes in semiquinone absorption, and kinetic near-IR spectroscopy to measure electrochromic shifts that occur in response to electron transfer. The results show that the rate of the observed electron transfer from Q A − ⋅ to Q B does not change as the redox free energy for electron transfer is varied over a range of 150 meV. The strong temperature dependence of the observed rate rules out the possibility that the reaction is activationless. We conclude, therefore, that the independence of the observed rate on the driving force for electron transfer is due to conformational gating, that is, the rate limiting step is a conformational change required before electron transfer. This change is proposed to be the movement, controlled kinetically either by protein dynamics or intermolecular interactions, of Q B by ≈5 Å as observed in the x-ray studies of Stowell et al. [Stowell, M. H. B., McPhillips, T. M., Rees, D. C., Soltis, S. M., Abresch, E. & Feher, G. (1997) Science 276, 812–816].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Proton-coupled electron transfer
Huynh, M. H. V., & Meyer, T. J. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0500030 · Cited by 1,659
Stubbe, J., Nocera, D. G., Yee, C. S., & Chang, M. C. Y. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020421u · Cited by 823
Dynamically Controlled Protein Tunneling Paths in Photosynthetic Reaction Centers
Balabin, I. A., & Onuchic, J. N. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5489.114 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Graige, M. S., Feher, G., & Okamura, M. Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-09-29
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 11679-11684
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2062504397
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conformational gating of the electron transfer reaction Q A − ⋅ Q B → Q A Q B − ⋅ in bacterial reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides determined by a driving force assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.20.11679
- The paper
- Graige, M. S., Feher, G., & Okamura, M. Y. (1998). Conformational gating of the electron transfer reaction Q A − ⋅ Q B → Q A Q B − ⋅ in bacterial reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides determined by a driving force assay. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.20.11679
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.