The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fluctuating silicate:nitrate ratios and coastal plankton food webs
Open accessAbstract
Marine diatoms require dissolved silicate to form an external shell, and their growth becomes Si-limited when the atomic ratio of silicate to dissolved inorganic nitrogen (Si:DIN) approaches 1:1, also known as the “Redfield ratio.” Fundamental changes in the diatom-to-zooplankton-to-higher trophic level food web should occur when this ratio falls below 1:1 and the proportion of diatoms in the phytoplankton community is reduced. We quantitatively substantiate these predictions by using a variety of data from the Mississippi River continental shelf, a system in which the Si:DIN loading ratio has declined from around 3:1 to 1:1 during this century because of land-use practices in the watershed. We suggest that, on this shelf, when the Si:DIN ratio in the river decreases to less than 1:1, then ( i ) copepod abundance changes from >75% to <30% of the total mesozooplankton, ( ii ) zooplankton fecal pellets become a minor component of the in situ primary production consumed, and ( iii ) bottom-water oxygen consumption rates become less dependent on relatively fast-sinking (diatom-rich) organic matter packaged mostly as zooplankton fecal pellets. This coastal ecosystem appears to be a pelagic food web dynamically poised to be either a food web composed of diatoms and copepods or one with potentially disruptive harmful algal blooms. The system is directed between these two ecosystem states by Mississippi River water quality, which is determined by land-use practices far inland.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of the effects of algal blooms on shellfish and aquaculture
Shumway, S. E. (1990) · Journal of the World Aquaculture Society · doi:10.1111/j.1749-7345.1990.tb00529.x · Cited by 717
Cited by
Camargo, J. A., & Alonso, Á. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.002 · Cited by 2,248
Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, A.K.A. “The Dead Zone.”
Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E., & Wiseman, W. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150513 · Cited by 1,330
Self-citationConcentration–discharge relationships reflect chemostatic characteristics of US catchments
Godsey, S. E., Kirchner, J. W., & Clow, D. W. (2009) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.7315 · Cited by 855
What is hydrologic connectivity and why is it ecologically important?
Pringle, C. (2003) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.5145 · Cited by 666
Anthropogenic and climatic influences on the eutrophication of large estuarine ecosystems
Paerl, H. W., Valdes, L. M., Peierls, B. L., Adolf, J. E., & Harding, L. J. W. (2006) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0448 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, R. E., Qureshi, N., Rabalais, N. N., Dortch, Q., Justic, D., Shaw, R. F., & Cope, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-10-27
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 13048-13051
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2169543125
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluctuating silicate:nitrate ratios and coastal plankton food webs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.22.13048
- The paper
- Turner, R. E., Qureshi, N., Rabalais, N. N., Dortch, Q., Justic, D., Shaw, R. F., & Cope, J. (1998). Fluctuating silicate:nitrate ratios and coastal plankton food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.22.13048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.