The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis for simple and accurate detection of mutations: Comparison with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and nucleotide sequencing
Open accessAbstract
Previously, an assay called conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis (CSGE) was developed for scanning PCR products for the presence of single-base and larger base mismatches in DNA. The assay was based on the assumption that mildly denaturing solvents in an appropriate buffer can accentuate the conformational changes produced by single-base mismatches in double-stranded DNA and thereby increase the differential migration in electrophoretic gels of heteroduplexes and homoduplexes. Here the sensitivity of assays by CSGE was improved by limiting the maximal size of the PCR products to 450 bp and making several changes in the conditions for PAGE. With the improved conditions, CSGE detected all 76 previously identified single-base changes in a large series of PCR products from collagen genes that contain multiple exons with highly repetitive and GC-rich sequences. In a survey of 736 alleles of collagen genes, CSGE detected 223 unique single-base mismatches that were confirmed by nucleotide sequencing. CSGE has the advantage over other methods for scanning PCR products in that it is simple, requires no special preparation of PCR products, has a large capacity, and does not use radioactivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
RAD50 and NBS1 are breast cancer susceptibility genes associated with genomic instability
Heikkinen, K. (2005) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgi360 · Cited by 208
Schwarze, U., Schievink, W. I., Petty, E., Jaff, M. R., Babovic-Vuksanovic, D., Cherry, K. J., Pepin, M., & Byers, P. H. (2001) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/324123 · Cited by 184
Gensure, R. C., Mäkitie, O., Barclay, C., Chan, C., DePalma, S. R., Bastepe, M., Abuzahra, H., Couper, R., Mundlos, S., Sillence, D., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci22760 · Cited by 172
Self-citationMutation analysis of the CHK2gene in families with hereditary breast cancer
Allinen, M., Huusko, P., Mäntyniemi, S., Launonen, V, & Winqvist, R. (2001) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2001.1858 · Cited by 85
Nikkilä, J., Coleman, K. A., Morrissey, D., Pylkäs, K., Erkko, H., Messick, T. E., Karppinen, S.-M., Amelina, A., Winqvist, R., & Greenberg, R. A. (2009) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2009.33 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Körkkö, J., Annunen, S., Pihlajamaa, T., Prockop, D. J., & Ala-Kokko, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-02-17
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1681-1685
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2055985641
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis for simple and accurate detection of mutations: Comparison with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and nucleotide sequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.4.1681
- The paper
- Körkkö, J., Annunen, S., Pihlajamaa, T., Prockop, D. J., & Ala-Kokko, L. (1998). Conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis for simple and accurate detection of mutations: Comparison with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and nucleotide sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.4.1681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.