The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative genetics in the grasses
Open accessAbstract
Genetic mapping of wheat, maize, and rice and other grass species with common DNA probes has revealed remarkable conservation of gene content and gene order over the 60 million years of radiation of Poaceae. The linear organization of genes in some nine different genomes differing in basic chromosome number from 5 to 12 and nuclear DNA amount from 400 to 6,000 Mb, can be described in terms of only 25 “rice linkage blocks.” The extent to which this intergenomic colinearity is confounded at the micro level by gene duplication and micro-rearrangements is still an open question. Nevertheless, it is clear that the elucidation of the organization of the economically important grasses with larger genomes, such as maize (2 n = 10, 4,500 Mb DNA), will, to a greater or lesser extent, be predicted from sequence analysis of smaller genomes such as rice, with only 400 Mb, which in turn may be greatly aided by knowledge of the entire sequence of Arabidopsis , which may be available as soon as the turn of the century. Comparative genetics will provide the key to unlock the genomic secrets of crop plants with bigger genomes than Homo sapiens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Somers, D. J., Isaac, P., & Edwards, K. (2004) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-004-1740-7 · Cited by 1,768
Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: What should we breed for?
ARAUS, J. L. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf049 · Cited by 1,243
The ABC’s of comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: building blocks of crucifer genomes
Schranz, M. E., Lysak, M. A., & Mitchell-Olds, T. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.09.002 · Cited by 575
The Promise of Comparative Genomics in Mammals
O'Brien, S. J., Menotti-Raymond, M., Murphy, W. J., Nash, W. G., Wienberg, J., Stanyon, R., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., Womack, J. E., & Marshall Graves, J. A. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.458 · Cited by 423
Towards a definition of a crop wild relative
Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B. V., Jury, S., Kell, S., & Scholten, M. (2006) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-005-5409-6 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Gale, M. D., & Devos, K. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-03-03
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1971-1974
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2130699672
- Cited by
- 945
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 73.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative genetics in the grasses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.5.1971
- The paper
- Gale, M. D., & Devos, K. M. (1998). Comparative genetics in the grasses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.5.1971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.