The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses
Open accessAbstract
In binocular rivalry, a subject views two incongruent stimuli through each eye but consciously perceives only one stimulus at a time, with a switch in perceptual dominance every few seconds. To investigate the neural correlates of perceptual dominance in humans, seven subjects were recorded with a 148-channel magnetoencephalography array while experiencing binocular rivalry. A red vertical grating flickering at one frequency was presented to one eye through a red filter and a blue horizontal grating flickering at a different frequency was presented to the other eye through a blue filter. Steady-state neuromagnetic responses at the two frequencies were used as tags for the two stimuli and analyzed with high-resolution power spectra. It was found that a large number of channels showed peaks at both frequencies, arranged in a horseshoe pattern from posterior to anterior regions, whether or not the subject was consciously perceiving the corresponding stimulus. However, the amount of power at the stimulus frequency was modulated in relation to perceptual dominance, being lower in many channels by 50–85% when the subject was not conscious of that stimulus. Such modulation by perceptual dominance, although not global, was distributed to a large subset of regions showing stimulus-related responses, including regions outside visual cortex. The results demonstrate a correlation between the conscious perception of a visual stimulus and the synchronous activity of large populations of neurons as reflected by steady-state neuromagnetic responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?
Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380621a0 · Cited by 560
Functional clustering: identifying strongly interactive brain regions in neuroimaging data
Tononi, G., McIntosh, A. R., Russell, D. P., & Edelman, G. M. (1998) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0313 · Cited by 283
Self-citation
Cited by
Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations?
Singer, W. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80821-1 · Cited by 2,581
Tononi, G. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5395.1846 · Cited by 1,561
Self-citationA neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks
Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M., & Changeux, J.-P. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529 · Cited by 1,347
The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review
Norcia, A. M., Appelbaum, L. G., Ales, J. M., Cottereau, B. R., & Rossion, B. (2015) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/15.6.4 · Cited by 1,234
Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes
Ward, L. M. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.012 · Cited by 1,009
Metadata
- Authors
- Tononi, G., Srinivasan, R., Russell, D. P., & Edelman, G. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-03-17
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3198-3203
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2068456184
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.6.3198
- The paper
- Tononi, G., Srinivasan, R., Russell, D. P., & Edelman, G. M. (1998). Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.6.3198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.