The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigation of the bottleneck leading to the domestication of maize
Open accessAbstract
Maize (Zea mays ssp.mays) is genetically diverse, yet it is also morphologically distinct from its wild relatives. These two observations are somewhat contradictory: the first observation is consistent with a large historical population size for maize, but the latter observation is consistent with strong, diversity-limiting selection during maize domestication. In this study, we sampled sequence diversity, coupled with simulations of the coalescent process, to study the dynamics of a population bottleneck during the domestication of maize. To do this, we determined the DNA sequence of a 1,400-bp region of the Adh 1 locus from 19 individuals representing maize, its presumed progenitor (Z. mays ssp.parviglumis), and a more distant relative (Zea luxurians). The sequence data were used to guide coalescent simulations of population bottlenecks associated with domestication. Our study confirms high genetic diversity in maize—maize contains 75% of the variation found in its progenitor and is more diverse than its wild relative,Z. luxurians—but it also suggests that sequence diversity in maize can be explained by a bottleneck of short duration and very small size. For example, the breadth of genetic diversity in maize is consistent with a founding population of only 20 individuals when the domestication event is 10 generations in length.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Hudson, R. R., & Kaplan, N. L. (1985) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/111.1.147 · Cited by 1,555
Cited by
De novo assembly, annotation, and comparative analysis of 26 diverse maize genomes
Hufford, M. B., Seetharam, A. S., Woodhouse, M. R., Chougule, K. M., Ou, S., Liu, J., Ricci, W. A., Guo, T., Olson, A., Qiu, Y., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abg5289 · Cited by 747
The limits of selection during maize domestication
Wang, R.-L., Stec, A., Hey, J., Lukens, L., & Doebley, J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/18435 · Cited by 740
Documenting domestication: The intersection of genetics and archaeology
Zeder, M. A., Emshwiller, E., Smith, B. D., & Bradley, D. G. (2006) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2006.01.007 · Cited by 447
Rabbit genome analysis reveals a polygenic basis for phenotypic change during domestication
Carneiro, M., Rubin, C.-J., Di Palma, F., Albert, F. W., Alföldi, J., Barrio, A. M., Pielberg, G., Rafati, N., Sayyab, S., Turner-Maier, J., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1253714 · Cited by 404
Domestication relaxed selective constraints on the yak mitochondrial genome
Wang, Z., Yonezawa, T., Liu, B., Ma, T., Shen, X., Su, J., Guo, S., Hasegawa, M., & Liu, J. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msq336 · Cited by 98
“…the significant associated reduction in effective population size may have greatly contributed to the faster accumulation of nonsynonymous substitutions observed in our study (Eyre-Walker et al. 1998; Gu et al. 2005) because negative selection is more efficient in large populations (Kimura 1962).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Eyre-Walker, A., Gaut, R. L., Hilton, H., Feldman, D. L., & Gaut, B. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-04-14
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4441-4446
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2050642876
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.