The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clonal selection and in vivo quantitation of protein interactions with protein-fragment complementation assays
Open accessAbstract
Two strategies are described for detecting constitutive or induced protein–protein interactions in intact mammalian cells; these strategies are based on oligomerization domain-assisted complementation of rationally designed fragments of the murine enzyme dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR; EC 1.5.1.3 ). We describe a dominant clonal-selection assay of stably transfected cells expressing partner proteins FKBP (FK506 binding protein) and FRAP (FKBP–rapamycin binding protein) fused to DHFR fragments and show a rapamycin dose-dependent survival of clones that requires ≈25 molecules of reconstituted DHFR per cell. A fluorescence assay also is described, based on stoichiometric binding of fluorescein-methotrexate to reconstituted DHFR in vivo . Formation of the FKBP–rapamycin–FRAP complex is detected in stably and transiently transfected cells. Quantitative rapamycin dose-dependence of this complex is shown to be consistent with in vitro binding and distinguishable from a known constitutive interaction of FKBP and FRAP. We also show that this strategy can be applied to study membrane protein receptors, demonstrating dose-dependent activation of the erythropoietin receptor by ligands. The combination of these clonal-selection and fluorescence assays in intact mammalian cells makes possible selection by simple survival, flow cytometry, or both. High-throughput drug screening and quantitative analysis of induction or disruption of protein–protein interactions are also made possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chen, J., Zheng, X. F., Brown, E. J., & Schreiber, S. L. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.11.4947 · Cited by 556
Cited by
Firefly Luciferase Complementation Imaging Assay for Protein-Protein Interactions in Plants
Chen, H., Zou, Y., Shang, Y., Lin, H., Wang, Y., Cai, R., Tang, X., & Zhou, J.-M. (2008) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.107.111740 · Cited by 1,525
In vivo protein labeling with trimethoprim conjugates: a flexible chemical tag
Miller, L. W., Cai, Y., Sheetz, M. P., & Cornish, V. W. (2005) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth749 · Cited by 323
LAMTOR/Ragulator is a negative regulator of Arl8b- and BORC-dependent late endosomal positioning
Filipek, P. A., de Araujo, M. E. G., Vogel, G. F., De Smet, C. H., Eberharter, D., Rebsamen, M., Rudashevskaya, E. L., Kremser, L., Yordanov, T., Tschaikner, P., et al. (2017) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201703061 · Cited by 119
(2022) · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac045 · Cited by 7
(2025) · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0299440 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Remy, I., & Michnick, S. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-05-11
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5394-5399
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2040102227
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clonal selection and in vivo quantitation of protein interactions with protein-fragment complementation assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.10.5394
- The paper
- Remy, I., & Michnick, S. W. (1999). Clonal selection and in vivo quantitation of protein interactions with protein-fragment complementation assays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.10.5394
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.