Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clonal selection and in vivo quantitation of protein interactions with protein-fragment complementation assays

Open access
Remy, Ingrid, Michnick, Stephen W.·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Two strategies are described for detecting constitutive or induced protein–protein interactions in intact mammalian cells; these strategies are based on oligomerization domain-assisted complementation of rationally designed fragments of the murine enzyme dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR; EC 1.5.1.3 ). We describe a dominant clonal-selection assay of stably transfected cells expressing partner proteins FKBP (FK506 binding protein) and FRAP (FKBP–rapamycin binding protein) fused to DHFR fragments and show a rapamycin dose-dependent survival of clones that requires ≈25 molecules of reconstituted DHFR per cell. A fluorescence assay also is described, based on stoichiometric binding of fluorescein-methotrexate to reconstituted DHFR in vivo . Formation of the FKBP–rapamycin–FRAP complex is detected in stably and transiently transfected cells. Quantitative rapamycin dose-dependence of this complex is shown to be consistent with in vitro binding and distinguishable from a known constitutive interaction of FKBP and FRAP. We also show that this strategy can be applied to study membrane protein receptors, demonstrating dose-dependent activation of the erythropoietin receptor by ligands. The combination of these clonal-selection and fluorescence assays in intact mammalian cells makes possible selection by simple survival, flow cytometry, or both. High-throughput drug screening and quantitative analysis of induction or disruption of protein–protein interactions are also made possible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5394

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
Remy, I., & Michnick, S. W.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-05-11
Volume
96
Issue
10
Pages
5394-5399
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2040102227
Cited by
231
References
1
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clonal selection and in vivo quantitation of protein interactions with protein-fragment complementation assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.10.5394
The paper
Remy, I., & Michnick, S. W. (1999). Clonal selection and in vivo quantitation of protein interactions with protein-fragment complementation assays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.10.5394

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.