The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological approaches and the development of “truly integrated” pest management
Open accessAbstract
Recent predictions of growth in human populations and food supply suggest that there will be a need to substantially increase food production in the near future. One possible approach to meeting this demand, at least in part, is the control of pests and diseases, which currently cause a 30–40% loss in available crop production. In recent years, strategies for controlling pests and diseases have tended to focus on short-term, single-technology interventions, particularly chemical pesticides. This model frequently applies even where so-called integrated pest management strategies are used because in reality, these often are dominated by single technologies (e.g., biocontrol, host plant resistance, or biopesticides) that are used as replacements for chemicals. Very little attention is given to the interaction or compatibility of the different technologies used. Unfortunately, evidence suggests that such approaches rarely yield satisfactory results and are unlikely to provide sustainable pest control solutions for the future. Drawing on two case histories, this paper demonstrates that by increasing our basic understanding of how individual pest control technologies act and interact, new opportunities for improving pest control can be revealed. This approach stresses the need to break away from the existing single-technology, pesticide-dominated paradigm and to adopt a more ecological approach built around a fundamental understanding of population biology at the local farm level and the true integration of renewable technologies such as host plant resistance and natural biological control, which are available to even the most resource-poor farmers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Altieri, M. A. (1995) · doi:10.3362/9781788532310 · Cited by 612
Cited by
Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture
Zhang, W., Ricketts, T. H., Kremen, C., Carney, K., & Swinton, S. M. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024 · Cited by 1,590
(2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,279
Complex responses of global insect pests to climate warming
Lehmann, P., Ammunét, T., Barton, M., Battisti, A., Eigenbrode, S. D., Jepsen, J. U., Kalinkat, G., Neuvonen, S., Niemelä, P., Terblanche, J. S., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.2160 · Cited by 474
Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries
Parsa, S., Morse, S., Bonifacio, A., Chancellor, T. C. B., Condori, B., Crespo-Pérez, V., Hobbs, S. L. A., Kroschel, J., Ba, M. N., Rebaudo, F., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1312693111 · Cited by 334
A Review of Resurgence and Replacement Causing Pest Outbreaks in IPM
Dutcher, J. D. (2007) · General Concepts in Integrated Pest and Disease Management · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6061-8_2 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, M. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-05-25
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5944-5951
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1972573280
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological approaches and the development of “truly integrated” pest management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.11.5944
- The paper
- Thomas, M. B. (1999). Ecological approaches and the development of “truly integrated” pest management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.11.5944
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.